Looks like another Harvard player might go UFA.
My son trains at a PEP academy. The skill level difference is real. He’s 12 and can do stuff that’s eye popping. All the kids in the academy are like that. The game is changed.I think three major factors that are driving the increase in scoring.
The first is the focus on skills development at all levels of the game. You see more and more young players entering the game with elite level offensive skills. And you see veterans working more on skills in the off season when the focus used to be mostly on strength and conditioning.
About – Belfry Hockey
belfryhockey.com
The Connor McDavid Story – Power Edge Pro Canada
poweredgepro.com
![]()
The Influence of Darryl Belfry
Belfry Hockey: Strategies to Teach the World's Best Athleteshockeysarsenal.substack.com
![]()
Former Bruin Adam Oates still dishing out assists — as personal skills coach - The Boston Globe
Oates is constantly on the phone or laptop with stir-crazy clients eager to return to the ice.www.bostonglobe.com
![]()
Book excerpt: Skills coach Darryl Belfry on finding the right drill for elite talent
The renowned skills coach works with the likes of Patrick Kane, Sidney Crosby, and Nathan MacKinnon.nhl.nbcsports.com
![]()
Oates Sports Group
At Oates Sports Group, we have one mission: to make our players better.www.oatessportsgroup.com
![]()
ELEV802 | Performance + Custom Ice
ELEV802 exists for one reason, and that is to constantly challenge, educate, and lead individuals to achieve their highest level of fitness. With our number one objective to provide the best training in the safest environment.www.elev802.com
The second factor has been GMs changing how they build rosters. Gone are the 6 shift a night fighters and you see more and more teams with 3rd lines that can really score when it used to be that teams really only had two scoring lines, a checking line, and an energy line.
The third factor is how analytics and the idea of the royal road and shot quality have changed how teams attack offensively to be more efficient.
I don't think goaltending is worse as much as it is the cat and mouse game between goalies and shooters swinging back more towards the shooters with the changes that have taken place throughout the game.
I remember seeing a video someone posted on YouTube criticizing John Gibson about this. Basically saying goaltending has been evolving the last few years and part of Gibsons issue is he hasn't made any adjustments to how he's playing. They also alluded to Quick not really evolving his game either. Whether that's the goalie or the coach is up for debate, but it could be a bit of both.
Here's the video. He does make some good points.
Kids puck handling skills .... while moving their feet .... is mind boggling compared to what my sons learned and could do 15 years ago. Closest analogy I can make is Japanese Benihana chefs and their knives! The relationship between stick 'n puck is symbiotic these days.My son trains at a PEP academy. The skill level difference is real. He’s 12 and can do stuff that’s eye popping. All the kids in the academy are like that. The game is changed.
Goaltending technique already changed but it hasn’t reached the NHL in force yet. Levi plays the new method that Korn is now teaching. Goalies Inc is teaching it was well.
It’s going to take 2-3 years for it to gain traction. But, as you can see with Levi, it works.
In short, Korn used the royal road models to inform technique change. He started having goalies play on their toes, forward more in the upper body, less sliding and staying down, always seeking to get back to skating positions, and downward tracking.
Yeah, the biggest difference I see all the time is the ability to move hands and feet simultaneously with heads up, at speed. It’s crazy how if that’s trained while the nervous system still has a high level of plasticity, how a kid can get good at it real fast.Kids puck handling skills .... while moving their feet .... is mind boggling compared to what my sons learned and could do 15 years ago. Closest analogy I can make is Japanese Benihana chefs and their knives! The relationship between stick 'n puck is symbiotic these days.
Skating foot work has completely revolutionized compared with what I taught just 5 years ago. Edge work is heavily emphasized with lots of technique adopted from figure skating. Skinner gives us lots of examples on ice but he's even behind the times. It used to be about power. Now it's a marriage of edge technique with power. Cale Makar regularly displays examples of these skills. Hell, I can't demonstrate any of that!
Finally, I credit small area games not just for more puck touches but how it emphasizes and improves puck and body control in tight spaces. Todays players don't stand and wait for line drills anymore. Constant fluid motion and control in tight spaces is a revolution in progress. Crosby started the shift with his tight corner/boards spins and puck protection. It's progressed beyond what Sid will show you in You Tube videos of him from 15 years ago.
My hero's from the 70's would be embarrassed by the skills and speed of todays comparable entry level NHL players. What these kids can do just blows me away......
With the scouts, Karmanos, and Ventura and crew, all having a voice in the decision making process, I think Adams has set things up well to get a variety of opinions that use a variety of methods to come up with. And that does seem like a solid way to go about making decisions to me.Like anything, it also has to be in moderation. As a military planner and leader, we study McNamara’s “whiz kids.” Robert McNamara fought the Vietnam War with some of the best minds in the US doing the strategic planning. And it backfired horribly.
I really like the great hockey mind surrounded by quants front office, which is a lot of what Adams has done. But there does need to be a voice of moderation or even counter to the general consensus, and that person needs to be listened to.
In the military, post-Vietnam, we created a group called “red teamers.” They challenge the general consensus and force new lines of thought. Not always successful because ducks like ducks, but there is some movement.
Botterill is a great example of a really good hockey mind who didn’t have someone in the room to challenge him. Francis is using him well but also probably acting as the break guy.
I think Adams’ role is also the sanity check. He’s got a great group of scouts who probably give the older school thoughts. His analytics departments give the statistical analysis. Karmanos and Ventura are veteran front office guys.With the scouts, Karmanos, and Ventura and crew, all having a voice in the decision making process, I think Adams has set things up well to get a variety of opinions that use a variety of methods to come up with. And that does seem like a solid way to go about making decisions to me.
That fourth line may go immediately into the tanking HOF.
Might still be better than that 14-15 Sabres line-up they rolled out at the end of the season.That lineup is a “who’s who” of “who’s that?”
Watch us lose to that on FridayThat lineup is a “who’s who” of “who’s that?”
Might still be better than that 14-15 Sabres line-up they rolled out at the end of the season.
That fourth line may go immediately into the tanking HOF.
Are we sure ChatGPT didn't invent this lineup?
Hartley telling Biron that Treliving is looking at a 5-year extension? That can't be current...![]()