TheTakedown
Puck is Life
- Jul 11, 2012
- 13,694
- 1,493
There continues to be whispers of a sort of “franchise player” designation that would not count toward the cap, or count at a reduced rate.
Having said that, it doesn’t have a ton of momentum behind it right now.
Dude that would be killer. Like one guy in every given year, tag can be moved every 2-3 years, something like that...
it isn't fair how an entire team needs to be dismantled because of a hard cap
they would basically have to change the entire system. letting teams go over the cap on certain players just means the players lose more $$ in escrow
The Max contract rules would have to be in place -- something like a percentage of the cap or the midway of the cap
The inability to move that tag often would lock that down though. Players would love it because you could effectively give a player who doesn't have NMC rights due to contract age to get those. So its a concession for both teams. I like using a "Franchise player $ amount"