Around the NHL - Part XLII - (Playoffs Edition)

Status
Not open for further replies.

DelZottoHitTheNetJK

Registered User
Mar 10, 2011
2,192
1,751
We're down 2-0 if they're not 4 for 9 in those games.

Everybody's powerplay runs hot and cold. That's why you have to be good at even strength. I have absolutely zero concern over the PP hitting a cold snap other than we have no ability to make up for it 5v5.

Our second unit is an abomination. Good PK teams like Florida can focus 200% of their film to the top unit because the 2nd unit is basically like playing 5 on 5. If they can even get the zone, they get forced to board cycles because not a soul on that unit can make a play to beat pressure.

The 2nd unit needs to improve, I'd be for putting Trouba back there full time to just hammer one timers and keep it simple. I think Gus is a better PP QB but he needs skill around him because he can't shoot. He's a Fox type PPQB where Trouba just goes full Tuba mode and "me clap one timer" for rebounds is a better fit for the dipshits on that unit
 

80shockeywasbuns

Registered User
Feb 12, 2022
2,003
3,482
Nothing Game 3.

Shorthanded goal Game 4.

Shorthanded goal Game 5.

Kreider scores 1 in Game 6 when he went Beast mode.

The cracks were beginning to show that series.
Kreiders goal in game 6 is honestly one of the most insane deflections I’ve ever seen. Panarin rifled a puck at his tits and he bunts it into the shelf.

It’s a good example of the talent out there prevailing in spite of a structure that doesn’t generate good looks for the best shooters out there (mika/bread).
 

80shockeywasbuns

Registered User
Feb 12, 2022
2,003
3,482
Our second unit is an abomination. Good PK teams like Florida can focus 200% of their film to the top unit because the 2nd unit is basically like playing 5 on 5. If they can even get the zone, they get forced to board cycles because not a soul on that unit can make a play to beat pressure.

The 2nd unit needs to improve, I'd be for putting Trouba back there full time to just hammer one timers and keep it simple. I think Gus is a better PP QB but he needs skill around him because he can't shoot. He's a Fox type PPQB where Trouba just goes full Tuba mode and "me clap one timer" for rebounds is a better fit for the dipshits on that unit
A big reason pp2 never improves is because Miller or Trouba spends 75% of the season on it. Put Jones there for an entire season and everyone out there will get quality puck touches with space on the half wall to mold their game.
 

DelZottoHitTheNetJK

Registered User
Mar 10, 2011
2,192
1,751
Yes there’s nothing wrong with Mika’s one timer, it’s great when they actually get him looks near the top of the circle especially off seam passes. They’re not generating these looks anymore so he’s pointless. And yes you’re totally right about Mika not shooting short side through screens anymore. I think he scored it agaisnt Philly once this year and that was it.

But it’s mainly a product of too much pressure and how Mika can’t handle it. They could probably be better with better coaching as I don’t think they set up 3 on 2s down low well when the two point players get blitzed up high.

I agree with a lot of what you're saying but I've seen nothing from Laf on the 2nd unit to warrant him being on the first unit. I think Mika is actually extremely strong when it comes to breaking pressure in-zone.

His zone entry attempts in the Florida series were atrocious but I mean.. that unit really isn't built to dump and retrieve. 4/5 guys on that unit aren't winning a puck battle behind the net so the zone entry options are limited. Gotta give Florida credit for taking the zone entries away; they definitely did their homework on us.
 

Machinehead

HFNYR MVP
Jan 21, 2011
148,003
126,792
NYC
If I did give Laf a look, it would be for Trocheck. I could see Laf excelling in a similar role to him anyway.

Being stuck with Zibanejad and having him not do one of the things he's at least good at is violently stupid. I'm getting brain cancer reading it.
 

80shockeywasbuns

Registered User
Feb 12, 2022
2,003
3,482
If I did give Laf a look, it would be for Trocheck. I could see Laf excelling in a similar role to him anyway.

Being stuck with Zibanejad and having him not do one of the things he's at least good at is violently stupid. I'm getting brain cancer reading it.
I don’t even want Laf out there for Laf. I want him out there to get Panarin back in a goal scoring role, get Trocheck more looks, Kreider more looks, Fox more looks. Lafreniere makes other players better at this point and Mika is a guy who stands still while everyone else does the work. Off the top of my head the only two playoff power play goals they scored in the last like 10 playoff games were tic tac toes that didn’t even involve Mika at all which isn’t a coincidence. Again, if you want to cook the Sabres in November Mika will get the job done. If you want zero weak links on the ice in the playoffs (which seems to be your philosophy for the team overall) you get Lafreniere out there who Panarin/Fox can actually bounce the puck off of and get it back
 

bl02

Registered User
Jan 13, 2014
33,167
23,629
A big reason pp2 never improves is because Miller or Trouba spends 75% of the season on it. Put Jones there for an entire season and everyone out there will get quality puck touches with space on the half wall to mold their game.
Makes too much sense. Gave up on it about a year and half ago hoping that Jones would be the 2nd pp unit qb. The kid barely gets a chance to play and when he does somehow the coaches think Trouba/Miller are better options at pp 2 QB.
 

Machinehead

HFNYR MVP
Jan 21, 2011
148,003
126,792
NYC
I don’t even want Laf out there for Laf. I want him out there to get Panarin back in a goal scoring role, get Trocheck more looks, Kreider more looks, Fox more looks. Lafreniere makes other players better at this point and Mika is a guy who stands still while everyone else does the work. Off the top of my head the only two playoff power play goals they scored in the last like 10 playoff games were tic tac toes that didn’t even involve Mika at all which isn’t a coincidence. Again, if you want to cook the Sabres in November Mika will get the job done. If you want zero weak links on the ice in the playoffs (which seems to be your philosophy for the team overall) you get Lafreniere out there who Panarin/Fox can actually bounce the puck off of and get it back
It's not a smart option. Find a way to get rid of Zibanejad or find a way to get some value out of him. Those are your choices.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Filthy Dangles

80shockeywasbuns

Registered User
Feb 12, 2022
2,003
3,482
It's not a smart option. Find a way to get rid of Zibanejad or find a way to get some value out of him. Those are your choices.
I’m not talking about salary cap implications. This is purely a “in an ideal world who would’ve helped us more in that series”
 

Machinehead

HFNYR MVP
Jan 21, 2011
148,003
126,792
NYC
I’m not talking about salary cap implications. This is purely a “in an ideal world who would’ve helped us more in that series”
We don't live in an ideal world. Taking him off the powerplay makes him more useless than he already is. And he's not bad at it to the point that it desperately needs to happen.

We know what Zibanejad is at even strength. You're being disingenuous saying he's not good on the powerplay to push a weird narrative.

download.png
 

Filthy Dangles

Registered User*
Sponsor
Oct 23, 2014
29,840
42,244
If I did give Laf a look, it would be for Trocheck. I could see Laf excelling in a similar role to him anyway.

Being stuck with Zibanejad and having him not do one of the things he's at least good at is violently stupid. I'm getting brain cancer reading it.

No.....he's too important in winning the initial faceoff. Unless you want zbads soft ass losing most draws clean and burning 40 seconds off as they try and get back in the zone.
 

Machinehead

HFNYR MVP
Jan 21, 2011
148,003
126,792
NYC
No.....he's too important in winning the initial faceoff. Unless you want zbads soft ass losing most draws clean and burning 40 seconds off as they try and get back in the zone.
Yeah but they do this thing now, it's really cool, where you have guys jump over the boards during play. They're calling it a line change.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: SnowblindNYR

Filthy Dangles

Registered User*
Sponsor
Oct 23, 2014
29,840
42,244
Yeah but they do this thing now, it's really cool, where you have guys jump over the boards during play. They're calling it a line change.

Chill with that condescending stuff, lol.

That's not a thing on the PP, having a faceoff specialist. Tro can do everything pretty well from shoot, pass and enter the zone, so to justify having Laf over him while being an elite faceoff man, Laf would really ahve to really do or have something the Rangers need.

Like you said its an elite PP. The only reason you would change it, is when it's gone cold and one individual is really stinking up the joint.

That guy in the playoffs and FLA series was Zibanejad. I agree, in the long haul you keep in on the PP as that's where he excels but when he's playing like shit in general and the PP has gone cold, I would say put Laf in his spot to try and spark something.
 
  • Like
Reactions: FUZfan

Filthy Dangles

Registered User*
Sponsor
Oct 23, 2014
29,840
42,244
Regardless of success and synergy of the current unit….There’s a legit argument for Laf on PP1 just in terms of establishing and elevating to a true top and elite player in the league (hopefully that comes true)

Top players obviously have to play and be impactful on the PP
 
  • Like
Reactions: FUZfan

Machinehead

HFNYR MVP
Jan 21, 2011
148,003
126,792
NYC
Chill with that condescending stuff, lol.

That's not a thing on the PP, having a faceoff specialist. Tro can do everything pretty well from shoot, pass and enter the zone, so to justify having Laf over him while being an elite faceoff man, Laf would really ahve to really do or have something the Rangers need.

Like you said its an elite PP. The only reason you would change it, is when it's gone cold and one individual is really stinking up the joint.

That guy in the playoffs and FLA series was Zibanejad. I agree, in the long haul you keep in on the PP as that's where he excels but when he's playing like shit in general and the PP has gone cold, I would say put Laf in his spot to try and spark something.
I'm just messing.

So have Tro play like a minute and then they can switch Laf in. We're too married to the idea of a PP1 and a PP2 that never interact.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Filthy Dangles

Nickmo82

Registered User
Mar 31, 2012
6,163
4,513
Japan
Ever since that post on the main boards crying that people credit Bouchard as elite, I've seen mistake after mistake after mistake from him that has led to goals against.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Tob

mike14

Rampage Sherpa
Jun 22, 2006
18,928
12,247
Melbourne
I'm just messing.

So have Tro play like a minute and then they can switch Laf in. We're too married to the idea of a PP1 and a PP2 that never interact.
I've been bleating about this for a while. Almost no team has 10 good PP players, especially a team like the Rangers. So instead of wasting 4-60 seconds on crap, just have 7-8 PP players and rotate them around to provide different looks.
You might start with Mika, Panarin, Tro, Fox and CK, and then after 30 seconds Mika changes with Laf, 40 seconds after that that Mika and someone else come on for Tro and CK and maybe Laf goes to the net and the 2nd player provides a better look from the point.
Fox and Panarin should play almost all of the 2 mins, but everyone else ends up playing about 1 min each with those guys

#toocomplicatedforprofessionals
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Ad

Upcoming events

  • HV 71 @ Lulea Hockey
    HV 71 @ Lulea Hockey
    Wagers: 3
    Staked: $213.00
    Event closes
    • Updated:
  • Croatia vs Portugal
    Croatia vs Portugal
    Wagers: 1
    Staked: $25.00
    Event closes
    • Updated:
  • Luxembourg vs Northern Ireland
    Luxembourg vs Northern Ireland
    Wagers: 3
    Staked: $50,550.00
    Event closes
    • Updated:
  • Poland vs Scotland
    Poland vs Scotland
    Wagers: 1
    Staked: $25.00
    Event closes
    • Updated:
  • Serbia vs Denmark
    Serbia vs Denmark
    Wagers: 1
    Staked: $25.00
    Event closes
    • Updated:

Ad

Ad