Filip Chytil
Registered User
- Mar 3, 2014
- 6,766
- 7,855
In what way does a cup or bust team benefit from not playing their 5 best power play skaters on the power play. If lafreniere makes the PP1 better then that’s where he should be. If your argument is “well Laf is the better option but it’s going to make his next contract cost more” then that’s an entirely different discussion. I get everything you’re saying though. You think the difference between Laf/Mika wouldn’t be much so it wouldn’t make sense to elevate Laf and increase his cost for the minimal upgrade at best. However I’m very confident that the difference between Mika and Laf on this power play would be significant. Idk if it would be reflected in their generation/conversion rates over a full season where they will just farm shitty teams but it absolutely would be against strong pressure PKs like CAR/PHI/FLA. Also, limiting opportunities for deserving young players so that they cost less is the most extra chromosome ass attempt at salary cap 3D chess ever, and it shouldn’t even be relevant for a win now team, although I wouldn’t be surprised at all if that’s part of the consideration for NYR. If this team had 3 brain cells Mika would be on Buffalo and Laf would be on an 8x6 as a ~ point per game player by now.We don't live in an ideal world. Taking him off the powerplay makes him more useless than he already is. And he's not bad at it to the point that it desperately needs to happen.
We know what Zibanejad is at even strength. You're being disingenuous saying he's not good on the powerplay to push a weird narrative.
View attachment 882627
A big reason pp2 never improves is because Miller or Trouba spends 75% of the season on it. Put Jones there for an entire season and everyone out there will get quality puck touches with space on the half wall to mold their game.
Naw still feels like shit, Rangers should be the ones doing the caving
I think it would have been a long series but tbh I think we probably lose the series. Their top guys would have gotten a ton of chances against us. We aren't Florida.I wonder how the Rangers would have ended up faring against the Oilers. Sucks that it could be the Rangers up 3-0 in an alternate universe.
"Just from the start, our compete and our will and the want to win this one was huge,” Bennett said. “Everyone down to our goalie were battling their butts off. It was nice to see the effort. You either have it, or you don’t. We have 23 dogs on our team that have that will. You either have it, or you don’t.”
Laf & Vinny? I'd also throw Igor in there. That's about it.This is the mentality we need on the team. We have about two dogs....
Bob might legit lose his butt given the amount he loses his stick and helmet.This is the mentality we need on the team. We have about two dogs....
Did you just copy my thread in the Trade Sub with McDavid?McDavid for Shesterkin, who says no?
Did you just copy my thread in the Trade Sub with McDavid?
Proposal: - Oilers/Rangers - Draisaitl for Shesterkin
Both players can become UFAs after next season. So it will be a mystery bag if each player re-signs or not with their new team. Both will get paid big bucks in that contract. Rangers would need to find goaltending, but can run with Quick for a bit. Oilers instantly become cup favorites again...forums.hfboards.com
I'd rather the bag licking be for the best player in the world than another f***ing circle jerk in Florida. f*** that state, f*** those teams.Haha the Edmonton BUMS getting outmatched. Florida is just too good. McDavid is the best player in the world but he can't even buy his team 1 win. Bobrovsky stole one for Florida in game 1. Even old man Crosby would have found a way to will his team to one win. No 'Cup for you Canada or McDavid so thankfully we won't have to hear all that bag licking for the next year. This was Mcdavid's best chance with Edmonton, I don't see them getting another crack at it. YA BLEW IT!!!
Mika is one of our five best PP players and you know he is. This is such a narrative. You're better than this.In what way does a cup or bust team benefit from not playing their 5 best power play skaters on the power play. If lafreniere makes the PP1 better then that’s where he should be. If your argument is “well Laf is the better option but it’s going to make his next contract cost more” then that’s an entirely different discussion. I get everything you’re saying though. You think the difference between Laf/Mika wouldn’t be much so it wouldn’t make sense to elevate Laf and increase his cost for the minimal upgrade at best. However I’m very confident that the difference between Mika and Laf on this power play would be significant. Idk if it would be reflected in their generation/conversion rates over a full season where they will just farm shitty teams but it absolutely would be against strong pressure PKs like CAR/PHI/FLA. Also, limiting opportunities for deserving young players so that they cost less is the most extra chromosome ass attempt at salary cap 3D chess ever, and it shouldn’t even be relevant for a win now team, although I wouldn’t be surprised at all if that’s part of the consideration for NYR. If this team had 3 brain cells Mika would be on Buffalo and Laf would be on an 8x6 as a ~ point per game player by now.
I also don’t really care about what these models say for power play. Idk how a model is supposed to figure out who the weak links are when the same 5 players play virtually every minute together for years in a row.
Pretty sure the Oilers say no 10/10McDavid for Shesterkin, who says no?
I don’t think this at all. Nothing on this site annoys me more than people who say the Laf truthers just want to see his point totals look good. You’re the one coping here, not them.Mika is one of our five best PP players and you know he is. This is such a narrative. You're better than this.
You have no evidence for Laf being an effective PP player. Again, you know this. It's really sad to see a smart poster pushing boomer ass narratives that I expect out of the Larry Brooks people.I don’t think this at all. Nothing on this site annoys me more than people who say the Laf truthers just want to see his point totals look good. You’re the one coping here, not them.
There should be a greater initiative to experiment when things have hit a wall, and not enough coaches do it in this league. I agree, on the face of it, Laf doesn't fit on PP1. If it has a cold stretch, then swap it out. You can experiment during the RS.You have no evidence for Laf being an effective PP player. Again, you know this. It's really sad to see a smart poster pushing boomer ass narratives that I expect out of the Larry Brooks people.
I have not jumped on the people who suggested we try it. I discussed that with @PuckLuck3043 last night.
To act like it's this factual thing and the Rangers are just refusing to do it is pushing an agenda. There's a mountain of evidence that Zibanejad is effective on the powerplay and Laf is untested. If anything, those are the facts.
I mean it's a great quote when you're winning but it doesn't really mean much. Where were all those dogs with 'will' when they were losing 9-3 in Game 5 last season?This is the mentality we need on the team. We have about two dogs....
I think one could hardly blame McDavid and Draisaitl form sucking in the playoffs. They have been bad this series, but they are all time performers.Florida is good team, and winning the Cup is stupid hard, but these player quips are just pointless