We've seen plenty of examples of players (Lidstrom and Brodeur for example) with long track records win awards because of their track record. If it can happen with other people I don't know it shouldn't happen with the best goalie since the lockout, especially against a guy who has proven absolutely nothing in the NHL. If players were actually chosen based on one season and reputation never played a role, I would have no argument. However since reputation does play a large part, I'll feel like Lundqvist is being screwed. I bet Bob falls back into obscurity next year.
Like another poster stated, It's an annual award and Hank doesn't deserve it this year. Also, as great as Hank has been since coming into the league in 05/06, he doesn't belong in the same sentence as Brodeur as a goalie and that's a fact!
Like another poster stated, It's an annual award and Hank doesn't deserve it this year. Also, as great as Hank has been since coming into the league in 05/06, he doesn't belong in the same sentence as Brodeur as a goalie and that's a fact!
Fine. But watch all of the so-called "hockey experts" call him a top 5 goalie in the league next year. Some called Quick better than Lundqvist. Which is ridiculous after him having 1 good year.
Like another poster stated, It's an annual award and Hank doesn't deserve it this year. Also, as great as Hank has been since coming into the league in 05/06, he doesn't belong in the same sentence as Brodeur as a goalie and that's a fact!
I wonder what Lundy's numbers would look like playing with Stevens and Neidermayer with an effective neutral zone trap.
Well other than being ridiculous as Hank most certainly is a worthy recipient of this award, there are politics that go into it.
Lidstrom's last Norris trophy was an absolute joke. The fact that he even received a nomination, let along winning it was crap.
That might be true but you're talking about one of the all time great defensemen(perhaps the 2nd or 3rd best defenseman I've seen and I've been watching hockey since 1960) so Lidstrom is then entitled to that honor even if he didn't deserve it that year.
Why not? Hanks stats are better while playing on worse teams.
Not saying hanks goalie career is better right now but it could be when all is said and done.
Roy won 4 cups, Brodeur 3 and although Hasek won only 1 cup(with Detroit), his performance with Buffalo between 1994 and 2001 was off the charts with a lousy team which he carried on his back to a SCF in 1999 vs Dallas. Hank, although great, will never be in the same league career wise with the other 3 goalies and the next time he carries the Rangers on his back in the playoffs will be the first time!
Which is exactly playing into my point of politics. Hank certainly deserves a nomination on this season alone in my opinion, and his past should definitely help give him a jump regardless.
You're right, he deserves a nomination this year(based on his numbers and tremendous play down the stretch). Hank is in the league 8 years now and he is generally acknowledged as the #1 goalie out there but, in all fairness, careers as all-time greats are defined by winning championship above everything else!
****, if I was Hank my back would be sore as **** already for carrying the Rangers through the past 7 seasons.
Roy won 4 cups, Brodeur 3 and although Hasek won only 1 cup(with Detroit), his performance with Buffalo between 1994 and 2001 was off the charts with a lousy team which he carried on his back to a SCF in 1999 vs Dallas. Hank, although great, will never be in the same league career wise with the other 3 goalies and the next time he carries the Rangers on his back in the playoffs will be the first time!
I believe Hasek won 2 Cups with Detroit, in 2002 and 2008.
It's where legends are born and I hope to see Hank cultivate that with us and not someone else a la Hasek.![]()
I believe Hasek won 2 Cups with Detroit, in 2002 and 2008.
Normally dont do this but it made me laugh. They are discussing Larssons potential on the Devils board. One poster said "Moves the puck like Karlsson, hits like Kronwall, Overall is Lidstrom" Talk about overrating youre prospect. I mean everyone does it to a certain extent, but thats on a whole nother level.
If you ask me he will be a solid 3/4 guy from what Ive seen. Lacks footspeed, and hasnt shown much offensively (though that could change).
What are the chances Buffalo actually beats Winnipeg tomorrow?![]()