MacLean is the best coach in the league, bar none.
I think he's going to make Byslma look silly at times.
and byslma is a really good coach
Bylsma is OK. Nothing that great — I think he has trouble keeping his teams composed, although strategically, he's pretty solid.
I actually think Tortorella would be the perfect coach for Pittsburgh — he's arrogant, condescending, and he'd whip them into shape. No more taking games off and relying strictly on skill.
They lost, bro. I don't care if there's a "direct cohesion". Their defense didn't show up when needed and their goaltending was bad. Just means that the Islanders weren't built to beat the Pens, and that' exactly what transpired.
Because the Rangers never take games off.![]()
Quiet a lot of Pittsburgh fans want Bylsma fired.
With the team he has available, he should be doing so much more. The guy took over in 2009, around the same time Torts took over in New York. For the rest of the regular season (25 games), they put up a sensational record, and Malkin single handedly won them the cup. Cool. I guess he did do something that year, although that's pretty standard with a new coach coming in.
Since then?
They've won the Atlantic the same number of times as everyone else (except the Islanders)
Made it to the second round, now twice, and never past that (which I suspect will stay so this year)
I don't ****ing care that Crosby was hurt, because they're still got the guy with more Art Ross trophies than him.
The whole franchise is pathetic, and is only competitive because they had the two best players in the world given to them.
They drafted Jordan Staal 2nd overall, right before Toews, Backstrom and Kessel. I'm assuming this was based on the fact that his brother won the cup that year.
They drafted Marc Andre Fleury 1st overall. Not just in the first round. First ****ing overall.
They're no different than the Oilers or any other **** franchises, aside from having the league gift wrap them Crosby and Malkin.
Sorry for the rant, but these ***** are just so easy to despise.
I wish the Rangers could tank a few yrs a win a cup. Clearly throwing the bank at FAs hasn't worked.
And where does tanking take you?
Nowhere, unless you get lucky like the Pens.
I wish the Rangers could tank a few yrs a win a cup. Clearly throwing the bank at FAs hasn't worked.
I wish the Rangers could tank a few yrs a win a cup. Clearly throwing the bank at FAs hasn't worked.
Is it just me or are these advanced stats gurus always saying "based on this they are the best team yada yada yada (insert excuse as to why they lost)"?
If the stats are such a great tool at determining things why is the on ice result often different.
Reminds me of Trouble With the Curve. "Anybody who uses computers doesn't know a damn thing about this game."
Can someone please tell me why that after one playoff series in so many years, the Islanders earned "respect". It's ridiculous. If they make the playoffs again next year, then alright, they get my respect. But as of now I'm 50/50 on the "respect" part.
Detroit didn't need to tank.
Uh, look at the late sixties to the early eighties for the Wings....??
![]()
Is it just me or are these advanced stats gurus always saying "based on this they are the best team yada yada yada (insert excuse as to why they lost)"?
If the stats are such a great tool at determining things why is the on ice result often different.
Reminds me of Trouble With the Curve. "Anybody who uses computers doesn't know a damn thing about this game."
Basically, if a team is playing with a PDO number way higher than 1.000, they're producing above their expected output. If a team is playing with a PDO number below 1.000, they're producing below their expected output. Over the course of a long season, the number will generally correct itself.
How does one measure expectation?