- Aug 14, 2011
- 3,787
- 962
I was wrong lol I can own it.Yo, @maplepred did you see what CBJ "got" for Laine plus second? Do you maybe see why everyone crapped on your suggestion that we give them Askarov, Nyqvist
Fabbro and 1st??
I was wrong lol I can own it.Yo, @maplepred did you see what CBJ "got" for Laine plus second? Do you maybe see why everyone crapped on your suggestion that we give them Askarov, Nyqvist
Fabbro and 1st??
And had a high contract.Laine was damaged goods. Not comparable.
And Askarov is seen as an impatient child. We might get something… or the ask is in the negatives if in the negatives then seen him to Kursk.Laine was damaged goods. Not comparable.
As a hockey fan I probably wouldn't pass the opportunity to see Stamkos in gold, but I can get behind the thought.That's a fantastic move by Montreal. I truly feel like there's a 30-goal scorer there with Laine and to get him for essentially nothing can turn out to be the trade of the decade. Laine also has only two years left on that deal so even if he continues to suck it's not going to hamstring the organization for years to come.
I certainly would've taken Laine over one of Stamkos or Marchessault just because of that contract length.
Ugh. No way. Laine is a problem child with occasional flashes of talent whereas Stamkos has a long steady proven history.That's a fantastic move by Montreal. I truly feel like there's a 30-goal scorer there with Laine and to get him for essentially nothing can turn out to be the trade of the decade. Laine also has only two years left on that deal so even if he continues to suck it's not going to hamstring the organization for years to come.
I certainly would've taken Laine over one of Stamkos or Marchessault just because of that contract length.
Stamkos is nearing the end of his career. Laine is soon in his prime. He's a wild card, so doesn't necessarily fit our "all-in" plan, but if he's able to turn it around this may end up being great deal for Habs. They have great young forwards in Caufield, Suzuki, Slafkovsky, so he doesn't need to carry such a heavy burden.Ugh. No way. Laine is a problem child with occasional flashes of talent whereas Stamkos has a long steady proven history.
They've been waiting on him to to turn it around since his first season in Winnipeg, always some reasoning that never happens.Stamkos is nearing the end of his career. Laine is soon in his prime. He's a wild card, so doesn't necessarily fit our "all-in" plan, but if he's able to turn it around this may end up being great deal for Habs. They have great young forwards in Caufield, Suzuki, Slafkovsky, so he doesn't need to carry such a heavy burden.
Yeah and the latest is the program. He's saying his mental health has reflected on his on-ice performance, but now he feels better than ever. Yeah, it's all just verbiage until we see him in action, but at his best he's amazing. I hope for his sake that he finds the joy in the game again and succeeds.They've been waiting on him to to turn it around since his first season in Winnipeg, always some reasoning that never happens.
If you look at his production per 60, two of his best three years are actually been in Columbus. His main problem the last few years have been that he's just hasn't been able to stay healthy. Obviously, that's a big concern going forward but so is Stamkos' age curve.They've been waiting on him to to turn it around since his first season in Winnipeg, always some reasoning that never happens.
O’Reilly and Nyquist game had started falling off before they got to the Preds as well.I have no issue at all with the Stamkos signing given Trotz had the cap space and it's hard to get into a rebuild given the roster construction. But I think some here are underplaying the risk of him declining substantially. In fact it's already started, he's dropped off a lot at 5v5. If he can maintain PP production away from Kucherov it'll be fine. I don't mind taking that bet all things considered.
You know what I read every time someone trots out and Points per 60 chart? A guy that hasn't been able to do it. Points per 60 don't mean a thing if you can't stay on the ice.If you look at his production per 60, two of his best three years are actually been in Columbus. His main problem the last few years have been that he's just hasn't been able to stay healthy. Obviously, that's a big concern going forward but so is Stamkos' age curve.
View attachment 902362
Seriously tragic rumors have been circulating about Johnny Gaudreau for a few hours. Worried what the news is going to be in the morning.
This is truly horrific. Devastated by this - my thoughts go out to their family and the Jackets. So sad.Blue Jackets' Johnny Gaudreau and brother killed in NJ crash involving suspected drunk driver
Johnny Gaudreau and his brother, Matthew, were killed by a suspected drunk driver while bicycling Thursday night in Oldmans Township, New Jersey.www.dispatch.com