Armourboy
Hey! You suck!
Unless we just collapse it's now a matter if we can get WC1 or 2Blues lose, Flames lose.
4 teams now trail us by 10 points.
Gotta feel pretty good now.
Unless we just collapse it's now a matter if we can get WC1 or 2Blues lose, Flames lose.
4 teams now trail us by 10 points.
Gotta feel pretty good now.
So what you're saying is the Tank doesn't work.Wings are in trouble and you just hate to see it. Have lost 5 in a row.
They have the ultimate get well stretch of schedule coming up, will be interesting to see if they can recover. Wish there was a way for them, Philly and Tampa to all miss but two of those three will make it most likely.
Plenty of people don't appreciate combined arms or what AT mines can do to a bunched column.So what you're saying is the Tank doesn't work.
Tank fans would say the Wings didn't tank hard enough. Their highest pick during their playoff drought has been 4th OA. Personally I'll take the mushy middle over being bad but not bad enough to be good againSo what you're saying is the Tank doesn't work.
Id point out that they failed to draft an adaquate goaltender till 2021 Cossa but he is years away from being a starter and theyve failed to have adequate NHL goaltending/defense. Much like Edmonton. You gotta get all the positions. Not just offense.Tank fans would say the Wings didn't tank hard enough. Their highest pick during their playoff drought has been 4th OA. Personally I'll take the mushy middle over being bad but not bad enough to be good again
Truth is they probably got a bit screwed by the lottery on that somewhat. Kind of saw the same thing with LA.Tank fans would say the Wings didn't tank hard enough. Their highest pick during their playoff drought has been 4th OA. Personally I'll take the mushy middle over being bad but not bad enough to be good again
Loser points are small potatoes as long as you are allowing teams to pull the BS teams are pulling with LTIR.The Islanders making the playoffs will likely spark some discussion about the loser point. They currently have 14 OTL points
Eastern conference teams always craping the bed.Geez, thanks for nothing Bruins
Win our games and none of that matters.Gonna suck if that OT stunt speaks a run for the Wild. They have the Ducks twice and the Blues twice in their next 5 games. Will Calgary seemingly done, they could easily bury the Blues and become our only serious challenger
The Islanders making the playoffs will likely spark some discussion about the loser point. They currently have 14 OTL points
I've always felt it should just use wins/losses.By the media, such as LeBrun who has long advocated for a different point system, perhaps.
Based upon the traction he's gotten in the past, I doubt the appetite for that kind of change exists within the league. The OTL points accrued by the Islanders this year is not unusual:
2022-23:
- Calgary w/ 17 OTL
- San Jose w/ 16 OTL
- 11 others w/ 10+ OTL
2021-2022:
- 14 with 10+ OTL (high of 14)
The only thing I don't like about that is that 3 v 3 overtime or the shoot out isn't representative of a real hockey game. I think you either do the 3-2-1 points system or just go back to having games end in ties with 1 point each.I've always felt it should just use wins/losses.
My personal opinion is losses of any kind should be 0 points. A team should not get a participation award if they lose.The only thing I don't like about that is that 3 v 3 overtime or the shoot out isn't representative of a real hockey game. I think you either do the 3-2-1 points system or just go back to having games end in ties with 1 point each.
Agreed. I’d hate to put an even more outsized influence on what are essentially skills competitions. I’ve never really been bothered by ties in the regular season anyways.If they're going to make losses worth 0 then something would need to be done about the format IMO. It wouldn't make sense to me to go to 3x3 followed by shootout (both very different than normal hockey) only to make it all or nothing.
Personally I would be fine with just having ties again.