"Welcome back, Edmonton. We've been expecting you."
-30th place
Matthews may want to peruse the Edmonton real estate listings.
Anze Kopitar could be in for a big week.
The Los Angeles Kings‘ No. 1 centre scored a crucial overtime winner Tuesday night, giving his club a 2-1 victory over the Vancouver Canucks, and now his contract situation may finally be cleared up.
According to reliable Kings insider John Hoven of Mayor’s Manor, who cites “multiple sources close to the negotiations,†Kopitar and GM Dean Lombardi are very close to wrapping up a new eight-year contract, the maximum term allowable under the collective bargaining agreement.
If Kopitar were to explore free agency, he could seek seven years at most from another team.
Hoven tweeted the working terms of the deal last week, projecting an average annual value of about $9.75 million, which would place Kopitar's cap hit just behind those of Jonathan Toews and Patrick Kane ($10.5 million each) for the NHL's highest.
Please sign Ristolainen for 8 years... ASAP
I wonder if the NHLPA will take a cue from the MLB Players Union and suggest to agents and players that they should try and hit UFA ASAP.
Isn't it already intuitive to try to do so? No memo needed.I wonder if the NHLPA will take a cue from the MLB Players Union and suggest to agents and players that they should try and hit UFA ASAP.
I don't see it either...Not sure how comparable the situations are. the NHL has far more restrictions on team spending. Plus the reductions in contract length to 8yrs with your team and 7 with someone else. I don't see a player really leveraging much more total money in the NHL like I think they can in baseball.
Indeed. First half of the term probably justifiable, or mostly justifiable (say 80% justifiable) for some team. He is big and durable (think Dainius Zubrus, Jaro Jagr), so may not decline quickly. So you pay $10M/year for someone worth $8M in a rising market. It's only a problem if you can't afford the incremental $2M per year (Cap hell - isn't LA looking bad, even with Voynov voided?) or you have a younger and/or cost-controlled talent you could spend the same amount or less on (and we assume in an efficient market, those better deals/opportunities won't be available). However, the back half of a 7 or 8 year deal - what will be 3 or 4 of the 15th to 18th years of his NHL career - is the dice roll / and the likely albatross around the neck. Will it be a Lecavalier situation?The Kopitar contract is going to be hilariously bad
Please sign Ristolainen for 8 years... ASAP
Not sure how comparable the situations are. the NHL has far more restrictions on team spending. Plus the reductions in contract length to 8yrs with your team and 7 with someone else. I don't see a player really leveraging much more total money in the NHL like I think they can in baseball.
Isn't it already intuitive to try to do so? No memo needed.
So Jonathan Bernier can be sent to the AHL for a conditioning stint because he's garbage but the NHL had to comb through the rules to prevent us from sending Grigorenko down a few seasons ago?
http://sports.yahoo.com/blogs/nhl-p...an-nugent-hopkins-trade-rumors-140229083.html
Sounds like Chia loved the Seguin trade so much he might be going down that road again.
I wonder how long it is before there are reports that RNH is a cancer in the Oilers locker room?