Kyndig
Registered User
- Jan 3, 2012
- 5,147
- 2,862
The article said that over the last decade, the NHL has reduced the size of goalie gear and Save% have gotten better. Therefore, there is no proven correlation between size of goalie gear and goal scoring in the NHL.
I agree with that premise.
It is not pad size.
They greatly reduced the thigh rise of the pads and you haven't seen a lot more 5 hole goals.
Players can't score low because of the butterfly save and pad designs that have greatly improved pad seal along the ice and the ability for goalies to get into a butterfly position and maneuver when down in the butterfly.
Making pads 10" or even 9" wide won't open up scoring along the ice.
That might open up holes just above the pads, however. But, it would take experimentation to prove whether those theoretical holes would lead to more goal scoring.
I do believe that C/As (and pants) could be designed to be more form fitting and less square to the shooter. And those design changes could make things more challenging for goaltenders.
Or, they could just make things lighter and make it even easier for goalies to move.
One way to make things tougher for goalies would be to turn back the clock on the materials used to make the pads and make the gear a lot heavier.
The fact that gear is a lot lighter than it used to be (partially due to being smaller due to the newer rules), makes it easier for goalies to move and make saves.
A bigger goalie gets bigger pads/shirt etc no? Maybe not the height of leg pads during butterfly but everything else. Two things that annoy me is how much of an advantage it is to just be a big goalie and how big all the goalies shirts are, its like they're wearing a dress 10 sizes too big.