Toggle sidebar

Around the NHL 11 - 2023/24

  • Xenforo Cloud will be upgrading us to version 2.3.5 on March 3rd at 12 AM GMT. This version has increased stability and fixes several bugs. We expect downtime for the duration of the update. The admin team will continue to work on existing issues, templates and upgrade all necessary available addons to minimize impact of this new version. Click Here for Updates
Status
Not open for further replies.
tbcwpg said:
I thought you were referring to the Bennett crosscheck on Coyle leading to the goal and review.

For the others, one of the on ice officials has to see the potential major penalty. If someone is bleeding but the refs or linesmen don't see what caused it they can't stop the game to rewind footage until they see something.



I think it's 4 because they reviewed the Vilardi penalty and it was explained afterwards that anything over a minor can be called by a linesman.
Click to expand...
But a linesman can't call the play dead haha?
 
WolfHouse said:
But a linesman can't call the play dead haha?
Click to expand...

No. Here's the relevant rulebook section:

The Linesperson may stop play and report what he witnessed to the Referees when:
(i) There are too many men on the ice Rule 74
(ii) Articles are thrown on the ice from the players’ bench or penalty bench Rule 75 (iii) When team personnel interfere with a game official Rule 39
(iv) When a player who has lost or broken his stick receives one illegally Rule 10
(v) When any identifiable player on the player’s or penalty bench, by means of his stick or his body, interferes with the movements of the puck or an opponent

Rule 56 The Linesperson must report upon completion of play, any circumstances pertaining to:
(vi) Major penalties
(vii) Match penalties
(viii) Misconduct penalties
(ix) Game Misconduct penalties
(x) Abuse of Officials
(xi) Physical Abuse of Officials
(xii) Unsportsmanlike Conduct Rule 20 Rule 21 Rule 22 Rule 23 Rule 39 Rule 40 Rule 75
 
tbcwpg said:
No. Here's the relevant rulebook section:

The Linesperson may stop play and report what he witnessed to the Referees when:
(i) There are too many men on the ice Rule 74
(ii) Articles are thrown on the ice from the players’ bench or penalty bench Rule 75 (iii) When team personnel interfere with a game official Rule 39
(iv) When a player who has lost or broken his stick receives one illegally Rule 10
(v) When any identifiable player on the player’s or penalty bench, by means of his stick or his body, interferes with the movements of the puck or an opponent

Rule 56 The Linesperson must report upon completion of play, any circumstances pertaining to:
(vi) Major penalties
(vii) Match penalties
(viii) Misconduct penalties
(ix) Game Misconduct penalties
(x) Abuse of Officials
(xi) Physical Abuse of Officials
(xii) Unsportsmanlike Conduct Rule 20 Rule 21 Rule 22 Rule 23 Rule 39 Rule 40 Rule 75
Click to expand...
Interesting...!! still doesn't explain how no video reviews are being called though
 
WolfHouse said:
Interesting...!! still doesn't explain how no video reviews are being called though
Click to expand...

The easy explanation is that no one thought there was a penalty to call at the time. They can only review a potential call if they call a major penalty, and if they don't see something or don't think there's a penalty there then they can't review it.

Like the Bruins themselves said they didn't see the Bennett punch to Marchand until they watched the video replay. If the 4 officials on the ice didn't see anything specifically, they can't call a major on Bennett for whatever and then take a look. With Trouba, my best guess is that they didn't think it was worth a penalty so they didn't review it.
 
Stumbledore said:
Utah Salties?
Click to expand...
374817AD-AB8C-4EBC-9351-EF760D50D3B5.gif
 
  • Like
Reactions: robertocarlos
tbcwpg said:
It was only a cross check to the face because Zadorov shoved McDavid from behind into Soucy's stick.
Click to expand...

It still would have been very high around the upper chest and neck area. Zadorov is a bitch for being the 3rd man in. The cross checks are dangerous, but I don't think they are going to get a suspension. I can see a fine. That's it. They're not going to take somebody out for a single game unless it was that egregious.
 
This battle of shittiest goalies really is enjoyable. Van goalie looks like a limp hazek out there.

League needs bigger nets (or smaller goalies).
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: surixon
CorgisPer60 said:
It still would have been very high around the upper chest and neck area. Zadorov is a bitch for being the 3rd man in. The cross checks are dangerous, but I don't think they are going to get a suspension. I can see a fine. That's it. They're not going to take somebody out for a single game unless it was that egregious.
Click to expand...

Huh. I was only half right. Zadorov gets a fine and Soucy gets a hearing. Bitches.
 
tbcwpg said:
No. Here's the relevant rulebook section:

The Linesperson may stop play and report what he witnessed to the Referees when:
(i) There are too many men on the ice Rule 74
(ii) Articles are thrown on the ice from the players’ bench or penalty bench Rule 75 (iii) When team personnel interfere with a game official Rule 39
(iv) When a player who has lost or broken his stick receives one illegally Rule 10
(v) When any identifiable player on the player’s or penalty bench, by means of his stick or his body, interferes with the movements of the puck or an opponent

Rule 56 The Linesperson must report upon completion of play, any circumstances pertaining to:
(vi) Major penalties
(vii) Match penalties
(viii) Misconduct penalties
(ix) Game Misconduct penalties
(x) Abuse of Officials
(xi) Physical Abuse of Officials
(xii) Unsportsmanlike Conduct Rule 20 Rule 21 Rule 22 Rule 23 Rule 39 Rule 40 Rule 75
Click to expand...
So it looks like they can't call double minors?
 
  • Like
  • Wow
Reactions: FonRiesen and BobTheSolarsystem
Will be crazy if Soucy gets suspended for a stick to the face of falling McD while Hughes cut gets ignored...

Really strong case to tank actually - if you get a star on your team, you get special treatment
 
Buffdog said:
So it looks like they can't call double minors?
Click to expand...

No, so my guess is they called a major and reduced to a double minor, as you said earlier as an excuse to review it.

I believe that more than a conspiracy against the Jets, at any rate.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Buffdog
tbcwpg said:
No, so my guess is they called a major and reduced to a double minor, as you said earlier as an excuse to review it.

I believe that more than a conspiracy against the Jets, at any rate.
Click to expand...
Yeah, I was just looking through the NHL rulebook. I think they fudged up the process a bit on the Vilardi play but ended up getting the call right.

Linesmen can stop the play if they see a high stick cause injury (double minor) but I seem to recall them letting the play go on until a whistle, at which point the refs huddled and called the major so they could review it. They should have just called the double minor off the get go

My suspicion is that nobody actually saw it so they called the major just to look at what they missed. I don't think it's a conspiracy, but they should have done the same thing in the Edmonton game but didn't. Inconsistencies like that are what lead to the conspiracy thoughts
 
  • Like
Reactions: BobTheSolarsystem
Status
Not open for further replies.

Latest posts

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Top Bottom