Around the NHL 11 - 2023/24

[bustamente]

Bruin's keep Swayman in net and promise retribution for Bennett's greasy dirty hit to their greasy dirty player. Maybe trying to win the game would be a better idea

 

[snowkiddin]

Bruin's keep Swayman in net and promise retribution for Bennett's greasy dirty hit to their greasy dirty player. Maybe trying to win the game would be a better idea

Another failure by Parros to not suspend Bennett.

 

[gojetsgo]

guess you are allowed crosschecking players into the goalie

 

[razorsedge]

How was that not goalie interference? Lol

 

[bustamente]

The refs don’t know a penalty that’s done right in front of their faces and the people doing the reviews are no better

 

[BobTheSolarsystem]

The refs don’t know a penalty that’s done right in front of their faces and the people doing the reviews are no better

I just want to see one post whistle review of a missed call besides vilardi in this entire post season

 

[Orrrules]

Panthers are the better team but that noncall on Bennet looks bad on the league. Heinz looked like that guy from scanners right before his head explodes.

Scanners Kb Scanners Offside GIF – Scanners Kb Scanners Offside – discover and share GIFs

Click to view the GIF

tenor.com

 

[snowkiddin]

The Bettman Bias is real. It’s not a conspiracy any longer

 

[Buffdog]

Every time I check the score in the van - edm series and see the shots on goal I giggle

Vancouver: 3 goals on 12 shots
Edmonton: 1 goal on 11 (getting better)

 

[tbcwpg]

I just want to see one post whistle review of a missed call besides vilardi in this entire post season

2 minute minors can't be reviewed. Only 4 minutes or more.

 

[bustamente]

You don’t need a lot of shots on goal to score on these two goalies

 

[roccerfeller]

You don’t need a lot of shots on goal to score on these two goalies

Winner of Dallas Avs is gonna feast methinks

 

[BobTheSolarsystem]

2 minute minors can't be reviewed. Only 4 minutes or more.

And what's your point? Hughes was cut or did you miss that... lots of potential major penalties not reviewed including trouba charging and Bennett...

 

[Buffdog]

2 minute minors can't be reviewed. Only 4 minutes or more.

Is it 4 or 5? I thought it had to be a major for some reason

Now refs are calling any play they want to review a major on the ice just to take a look at it. I kind of like the idea, but also kind of hate it

And what's your point? Hughes was cut or did you miss that... lots of potential major penalties not reviewed including trouba charging and Bennett...

Someone has to see it. In the Vilardi case, a linesman saw it

In order for a penalty to be considered a major, certain criteria need to apply

 

[cbcwpg]

guess you are allowed crosschecking players into the goalie

According to NHL Rule 69.1, “If a defending player has been pushed, shoved, or fouled by an attacking player so as to cause the defending player to come into contact with his own goalkeeper, such contact shall be deemed contact initiated by the attacking player for purposes of this rule, and if necessary a penalty assessed to the attacking player and if a goal is scored it would be disallowed.”

Bruins coach Jim Montgomery said he was told by the referees that “the play didn’t interfere with the goal."

“That’s the explanation I got," Montgomery said.

 

[BobTheSolarsystem]

Is it 4 or 5? I thought it had to be a major for some reason

Now refs are calling any play they want to review a major on the ice just to take a look at it. I kind of like the idea, but also kind of hate it


Someone has to see it. In the Vilardi case, a linesman saw it

In order for a penalty to be considered a major, certain criteria need to apply

No one saw rhe vilardi stick... the guy lay on the ice... maybe that was Hughes mistake

 

[Buffdog]

According to NHL Rule 69.1, “If a defending player has been pushed, shoved, or fouled by an attacking player so as to cause the defending player to come into contact with his own goalkeeper, such contact shall be deemed contact initiated by the attacking player for purposes of this rule, and if necessary a penalty assessed to the attacking player and if a goal is scored it would be disallowed.”

Bruins coach Jim Montgomery said he was told by the referees that “the play didn’t interfere with the goal."

“That’s the explanation I got," Montgomery said.

I don't think Swayman would have gotten to that shot. That's probably what the refs meant

No one saw rhe vilardi stick... the guy lay on the ice... maybe that was Hughes mistake

The explanation given was that the linesman saw it... which is still a cop out, becaue they can only call majors (I think). But clearly vilardi's stick hit him accidentally... so the refs call it a major on the ice (bullshit) just to get the opportunity to take a look at it to give the double minor

 

[Larabee]

Do you remember when we thought Chevy was a genius for signing Monahan instead of Lindholm ?

 

[Buffdog]

Do you remember when we thought Chevy was a genius for signing Monahan instead of Lindholm ?

Rumor was that we were in on Lindholm but the Flames liked the prospect they got from Vancouver

Chevy pivoted and got his Plan B

 

[Hobble]

Rumor was that we were in on Lindholm but the Flames liked the prospect they got from Vancouver

Chevy pivoted and got his Plan B

I bet they wanted Stanley, and Chevy said no dice.

 

[bustamente]

Well at least Silovs is stopping the puck

 

[sipowicz]

Every time I check the score in the van - edm series and see the shots on goal I giggle

Vancouver: 3 goals on 12 shots
Edmonton: 1 goal on 11 (getting better)

Shit goaltending doesn’t win you a Stanley Cup, Edmonton hasn’t figured that out yet!

With Helly playoff level goaltending you don’t even win a a series!

 

[Avocado Coolranch]

Wow 45-18 shots, Canucks barely escaped that one. I guess beast like goaltending in the playoffs does exist…

 

[tbcwpg]

And what's your point? Hughes was cut or did you miss that... lots of potential major penalties not reviewed including trouba charging and Bennett...

I thought you were referring to the Bennett crosscheck on Coyle leading to the goal and review.

For the others, one of the on ice officials has to see the potential major penalty. If someone is bleeding but the refs or linesmen don't see what caused it they can't stop the game to rewind footage until they see something.

Is it 4 or 5? I thought it had to be a major for some reason

Now refs are calling any play they want to review a major on the ice just to take a look at it. I kind of like the idea, but also kind of hate it

I think it's 4 because they reviewed the Vilardi penalty and it was explained afterwards that anything over a minor can be called by a linesman.

 

[Duke749]

Do you remember when we thought Chevy was a genius for signing Monahan instead of Lindholm ?

We signed Monahan?