Around the NHL — Episode XLXVII

  • PLEASE check any bookmark on all devices. IF you see a link pointing to mandatory.com DELETE it Please use this URL https://forums.hfboards.com/

Tuna99

Registered User
Sep 26, 2009
15,493
7,451
Maybe George Paros is good for hockey? He came into player safety when the game was at its softest and the game has gotten more violent, more goony and more hateful which is all good stuff. Thoughts?
 

maclean

Registered User
Jan 4, 2014
8,835
2,843
So Boston has picked up Vancouver's Jiří Patera on waivers, fuelling more netminder speculation where they could have him as the backup to Korpi
 

HSF

Registered User
Sep 3, 2008
26,341
7,828
Korchinski never should have been in the NHL at 19, especially on a dumpster fire team.

Terrible way to develop a promising young defenseman. Having him spend some time in the AHL should be good for his development, but you never like to see a player drop levels.
they kept him up cause they thought he was too good for juniors. Now that he can play in the AHL it makes sense they sent him there.

Seems like this was the plan
 

Sens of Anarchy

Registered User
Jul 9, 2013
66,727
52,114
Unsure how that works.

If he's still being paid, he should be on the cap one way or another.

Though, I am absolutely awful at understanding that kind of stuff with labour relations and law
I am not clear on the details re Lehner but it just triggered me on Vegas somehow getting their way with the NHL
 

BondraTime

Registered User
Nov 20, 2005
29,542
25,037
East Coast
I am not clear on the details re Lehner but it just triggered me on Vegas somehow getting their way with the NHL
I don't know if I think Vegas is getting their way. Lehner never showed up to camp and is clearly in trouble with his money and finiances. Not showing up to camp "should" clear them of having him on their cap as he voided his contract.

I guess they reached some sort of agreement to pay him a % of what he's owed instead of going through the ringer with lawyers.
 

Sens of Anarchy

Registered User
Jul 9, 2013
66,727
52,114
I don't know if I think Vegas is getting their way. Lehner never showed up to camp and is clearly in trouble with his money and finiances. Not showing up to camp "should" clear them of having him on their cap as he voided his contract.

I guess they reached some sort of agreement to pay him a % of what he's owed instead of going through the ringer with lawyers.
I am sure you are right. just emo on my part
 
  • Haha
Reactions: Golden_Jet

Oscar The Grouch

Registered User
Oct 16, 2021
1,006
2,134
Unsure how that works.

If he's still being paid, he should be on the cap one way or another.

Though, I am absolutely awful at understanding that kind of stuff with labour relations and law

It's likely his contract was voided and he agreed not to grieve it for a pay-out of some fraction of the remaining contract amount.
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad