Ice-Tray posted the comparison in the first place, out of the blue, surely to draw a reply or two given the post directly comparing the two owners and their transgressions. If that wasn't their intention, that's okay, but why comment out of nowhere directly comparing the evil deeds then? First I just agreed that men are evil and carried on. Then another poster pointed out the issue with comparing the evil deeds of two bad men as if one exonerates the other, and I simply agreed and pointed out that we also don't know the true scope of Melnyk's and can't really know how bad or not he was, which is accurate. Same could be said about Katz. Not once did I say that Melnyk's and Katz' transgressions were equal, but directly comparing them as in the original post, which never came from me, is a typical way of propping up another to make the other look better. Again, maybe that wasn't their intention, but the post below that started this sure looks to me like a very obvious comparison of both the men and their evil deeds and I don't know why I'm being painted as if I made this a big thing out of nowhere.
So Katz in the news again for allegedly paying for underaged sex.
Certainly makes Eugene’s media blunders seem quaint in comparison.