I don't know, we're almost 10 years removed from his prime, NHL has continued to evolve so a similar player today is often going to be seen as "better"
Marc Methot was pretty good defensively and brought a very nice physical dimension but he was a black hole on offense outside of his shot. Zub is better offensively, sure but that's not with this part that he'll earn most of his money.
I'm sure I missed someone that's very obvious and I'm sure I put some names on here that people don't think should be. I tried to stay away from high end top pair dmen with offensive ability but I put a few puck movers I felt were more defensive than offensive. Choose your top 10 Defensive...
forums.hfboards.com
Look at contracts for most of the guys named in that thread. For example, Erik Cernak who got a 5.2 AAV extension. Do you think Zub is better or even as good?