Ah, missed that part. Still many other teams going to have to invest in their own now or just wait and hope to bloggers pick up the slacks (which usually is the case)
This is what bugs me the most.
So it sounds like part of the decision was that multiple teams
had outsourced CapFriendly to create/maintain their internal infrastructures or run special programs and stuff, and Washington purchased the site for proprietary access to that, therefore stopping other teams.
But NHL teams were going to CapFriendly because they were proven professionals with a demonstrable product - but
not because CapFriendly had access to anything extra that the teams don't already have. NHL teams have access to the Central Registry already; they have access to contract details and trade calls and central scouting and CBA specialists, etc.
It was simply, "hmmm we have a lot of data here, it would be great if we had some 'Product X' to manage it all... Oh, you guys have a Product X that can manage all this data? Great!"
Now they'll just find some other company to create a Product X.
This is a mild inconvenience at most to the other teams. They didn't lose any access to any data, just a premade and well-baked backend.
But it's a major detriment to fans who don't have access to contract copies and central registries, and are lost in that world without a reliable and publicly faced "Product X".