thewave
Toronto Maple Leafs Toy Co.
- Jun 17, 2011
- 44,320
- 14,865
Potentially not.
Replace with new age Gary Roberts or Darcy Tucker and yes.
Potentially not.
There’s no negative.Potentially not.
You can't run a team if you are afraid to try something new.The issue is that a lot of people assume that a Marner trade is a magic solution. Have you seen the packages being thrown around?
Frankly, it's a bit stupid to vaguely talk about a Marner trade without any proposal of what the team will look like
During the same time, the Oilers got their asses busted by similarly awful teams. I think they got swept.
Thornton and MarleauYeah I'm convinced that we'd lose to the Senators in 7 games in this day and age too.
We're the Sharks of this era but with even less playoff success somehow. The culture built a core that is so maladaptive to playoff hockey that 5 playoff wins is probably its ceiling.
There’s nothing negative that could happen by trading Marner. The team and the NHL will still exist.You can't run a team if you are afraid to try something new.
We 100% know the existing core doesn't win. They've been here from 6 to 8 years, everything else has changed around them, and they've failed every time.
What exactly are we clinging on to by keeping the status quo? Nothing. What have they accomplished as a team? Nothing. Why are they so dear to anyone? They have brought us no team success yet they demand the world in return.
By trying something new you are trying a new formula. If the existing thing doesn't work toy try to fix it. We need to stop letting these lemmings lead us off the same cliff year after year.
It’s bad for business to have a Canadian team in the finals, especially in a year MSPN/ABC has the rights.Will Bettman allow a Canadian team to win it all?! Is this another Canadian in the finals tease??
I'm at the point where I would give marner away for free just to try something different.The issue is that a lot of people assume that a Marner trade is a magic solution. Have you seen the packages being thrown around?
Frankly, it's a bit stupid to vaguely talk about a Marner trade without any proposal of what the team will look like
During the same time, the Oilers got their asses busted by similarly awful teams. I think they got swept.
That's a generous comparison to our guys. While those Sharks team definitely have the choker label attached to them, they made it out of the first round more often than not.Thornton and Marleau
Matthews and marner
Sharks lost in finals one year, lost in 3rd. year another.
I have said this in another thread, the more accurate historical comparsion should be Marcel Dionne. Dionne only made out of the first round 3 times and never reached the 3rd round in his career.That's a generous comparison to our guys. While those Sharks team definitely have the choker label attached to them, they made it out of the first round more often than not.
1 SCF appearance, 4 WCF appearances, and 9 WCSF apperances from Thornton's arrival in 2005 to their final appearance in 2019. Those Sharks teams peaked higher in the regular season as well, winning the Presidents trophy once.
Our guys and their futility is in a league of it's own.
What?Stars have been DeBoer’d
Looks like it’s shaping up to be the first SCF I don’t watch in my lifetime. I like Florida, but we have to boycott MSPN/ABC if a Canadian team is in.
Replace with new age Gary Roberts or Darcy Tucker and yes.
You can't run a team if you are afraid to try something new.
We 100% know the existing core doesn't win. They've been here from 6 to 8 years, everything else has changed around them, and they've failed every time.
What exactly are we clinging on to by keeping the status quo? Nothing. What have they accomplished as a team? Nothing. Why are they so dear to anyone? They have brought us no team success yet they demand the world in return.
By trying something new you are trying a new formula. If the existing thing doesn't work toy try to fix it. We need to stop letting these lemmings lead us off the same cliff year after year.
I really don't think there is any issue with marner. He just has a to have a coach that doesn't give him free reign.The issue is that a lot of people assume that a Marner trade is a magic solution. Have you seen the packages being thrown around?
Frankly, it's a bit stupid to vaguely talk about a Marner trade without any proposal of what the team will look like
The word "Depth" (as in lack of supporting cast) always comes up in regards to the Leafs Cap heavy spending on Leafs Core 4 forwards.What can we even say about this? I mean you just post it and throw your hands in the air. Maybe look at the Leafs management and shake your head.
That's a generous comparison to our guys. While those Sharks team definitely have the choker label attached to them, they made it out of the first round more often than not.
1 SCF appearance, 4 WCF appearances, and 9 WCSF apperances from Thornton's arrival in 2005 to their final appearance in 2019. Those Sharks teams peaked higher in the regular season as well, winning the Presidents trophy once.
Our guys and their futility is in a league of it's own.
Why?Stars have been DeBoer’d
Looks like it’s shaping up to be the first SCF I don’t watch in my lifetime. I like Florida, but we have to boycott MSPN/ABC if a Canadian team is in.
I dont want to give them viewership under the best of circumstances, if a Canadian team is in we can avoid them.Why?
Yes but what did they do to make you want to boycott them? Genuinely curious as I never pay any attention to stuff like this.I dont want to give them viewership under the best of circumstances, if a Canadian team is in we can avoid them.
The Sharks usually had amazing depth, their star players didn't rob their organization for every penny they could and they actually always had deep groups with strong defensive cores.That's a generous comparison to our guys. While those Sharks team definitely have the choker label attached to them, they made it out of the first round more often than not.
1 SCF appearance, 4 WCF appearances, and 9 WCSF apperances from Thornton's arrival in 2005 to their final appearance in 2019. Those Sharks teams peaked higher in the regular season as well, winning the Presidents trophy once.
Our guys and their futility is in a league of it's own.
They have some great people working there, but they also have employed some despicable people over the years.Yes but what did they do to make you want to boycott them? Genuinely curious as I never pay any attention to stuff like this.
The word "Depth" (as in lack of supporting cast) always comes up in regards to the Leafs Cap heavy spending on Leafs Core 4 forwards.
This is what is meant by production from depth (secondary scoring) behind your stars and good Cap $$ management..
Oilers are the perfect example.
View attachment 878224
Their core 4 forwards account for $31.625 mil combined.
View attachment 878225
They've combined for 33 goals 60 assists 93 points in 17 games (in 3rd round).
Our Leafs Core 4 consume $40.5 mil combined cap and produced 6 goals 5 assists 11 points.
View attachment 878233
For the single price of a Tavares or Marner @ $11 mil the Leafs could deploy 2 X players like RNH and Hyman for less cap space.
Some Leaf fans after seeing Matthews get $13.25 mil and Nylander $11.25 mil new contracts how could keeping Leafs core 4 together with a pending Marner raise be the direction they would prefer, believing it brings the Leafs playoff success?
Shaking ones head and throwing their hands in the air the only way to surrender to this.![]()
Sharks won their Division four times with Marleau and Thornton. A far cry from these Leafs and their one fake Canadian Division regular season title.
Will Bettman allow a Canadian team to win it all?! Is this another Canadian in the finals tease??
Forget it. His takes are absurd.What?
Why?