GoldenBearHockey
Registered User
- Jan 6, 2014
- 10,236
- 4,315
I never said by himself. However I look at the series vs Winnipeg a couple of years ago. The Oilers were the higher seeds and lost, a team led by a true generational player would have won that series, no doubt. He cherry picks in play-off games. In regular season games the Oilers are being outplayed he only seems to try when on the pp to get his points (Drai is really bad at that). So no, not generational for me. Best in the game? yes. generational? No. Hall of fame? No brainer.
I don’t need a cup for him to be generational but I need more. He needs to make his team over achieve in the playoffs… he hasn’t done that (see Gretzky in ‘93 as an example of generational form without actually winning). He may get there but he was anointed generational before he played a single game. Sorry but you need to earn it and points are not enough.
On average there should be a single generational player every 20-30 years (which is what a generation is) we have about 6-10 playing in the
game currently on most peoples definitions.
See Gretzky, 93 oh you mean with Robitaille, Kurri, Granato, Sandstrom, Blake, Zhitnik, Coffey, Sydor,
I mean I get what you are saying, but Greztky wasn't by himself
I agree with GBH (somehow)
If you put mcdavid's exact production on a team with competent bottom 6, goaltending, and/or defense, they stroll to a cup and then suddenly he's a winner.
Careful now, can't have too much of that....