bland
Registered User
- Jul 1, 2004
- 7,948
- 12,167
This is like the 10th iteration of the same conversation... not that theres anything wrong with that, just pointing it out....maybe we need a poll to see what the breakdown is.. probably 100 to 1 in favor is my guess.
Do it and pin it. You can get a loooooooong list of posters who care more about highlights than winning and have no ability to project out beyond the next game.
I couldn't care less how many goals the Kings score this year, it doesn't mean a damn thing. I care about the health of the franchise and its ability to get back to championship contention. You don't get there by adding great players to unprepared teams that aren't ready to contend and hoping the rest of the roster grows up to their level.
It never works. All you would achieve is creating a list of posters who either prioritize exciting hockey or didn't pay much attention to the history of this team or the successful organizations around the league.
Fiala would be a hell of an addition if the kids were a few years ahead of this mismanaged path. But they aren't, so the best move would be to have waited for the right time because Fiala's production is available every summer - instead Blake took an offer that fell into his lap instead of waiting for the right time. That is the kind of weak executive he has proven to be time and again.
Just like he did with Danault the year before. Two excellent players who will be out of their prime and financial albatrosses when Byfield and Clarke have taken over for Kopitar and Doughty, if that happens. And we better hope that does happen because if they don't its guaranteed mediocrity. If they had waited they could use that space on players in their prime at the time without $14 million in 30+s. Of course, the kids here haven't been primed for those spots yet, so its going to take even longer than that should have.