Ever hear of Harold Ballard?
View attachment 735860
Good God, not Harold Ballard.
It's not really a fair comparison. Ballard was an owner that didn't care about winning the cup. He cared about making money and feuding with the fans.
Sounds a lot like ML$E actually.
From what I can tell the majority of NHL teams are owned by individuals. Guys that want to bring recognition to their hometown teams. And it seems like those franchises, for the most part, have had the most success lately.
Pttsburgh won it when Mario was owner.
Tampa won it with Vinick as owner.
Stan Kroenke owns Colorado.
The Jacobs family and the Bruins.
Rogers and Bell have too many conflicting interests to make the Leafs winning a cup top priority for them. How is it possible Bell is allowed to invest in both the Canadiens and the Leafs for example. Not to mention their media empire monopoly.
For $100 a month Rogers and Bell will be more than happy to help you become fans of another team.
I feel like an individual owner would have more interest in winning. Corporations have to answer to their shareholders. An individual with a passion for the game who wants to leave a legacy might be a better choice.
Someone who cares about winning more than making bank.
And maybe, long shot I know, but just maybe, his attitude would leak down to the players. Instead of the "cash is king" mentality of the corporate owners. The owners set the example for the entire organization to follow.
That's why all their stars are greedy money chasing losers too.