hockeywiz542
Registered User
- May 26, 2008
- 16,552
- 5,542
Marner is no longer overpaid after Suzuki and Tkachuk deals. We have a legit 90-100 point player lol.
Marner is no longer overpaid after Suzuki and Tkachuk deals. We have a legit 90-100 point player lol.
Points aren't the only thing that matters.Since points is the only thing that matters you should take a look at Nurse’s contract instead. 9,25M.
Mo and Nurse score just as much points. Pulock is playing in a defensive system and that is hurting his pay check.
Unless it is Patrick Marleau.Points aren't the only thing that matters.
Pulock is partnered with the best defensive defenceman in the league, playing for one of the best coaches in the league, on a legitimate contender (second best team in the playoffs the last two years). A hometown discount isn't unreasonable.
Plus, Lamoriello is a tough negotiator.
Marner is still overpaid. There are also newer overpaid contracts, maybe even worse. But, in all three cases, there are rationalizations as to why they are acceptable, maybe.
Doesn't seem that bad to me. I think over the course of the deal he'll earn that money. Good player.
How many forwards out there who score 90+, play matchup minutes and play all situations?
The list is basically Barkov and Marner. You can probably add a few more elite names if you ease the PK minute restriction but Marner is on a very short list of elite players.
Mentioning him in the same breath as a Suzuki or a Tkachuk is actually kind of an insult to him.
Paid for potential … let’s see if that is worth it in end.. I think it will be
...and the Zaitsev deal was a steal tooUnless it is Patrick Marleau.
Best defense tandem in the league? That's quite the claim. And while those contracts aren't bad, they were coming off 14 and 17 point seasons, so right or not, their earning potential was limited. Lou has signed a lot more than just those two.He's got the best defence tandem in the league locked up for the next eight years, for under 12M combined.
Marner was on the PK in 2018-2019, before signing.Marner wasn't a PK guy, matchup at time of signing.
He wasn't though.Marner was a $9.5 mil player, at the time of his signing.
Best defense tandem in the league? That's quite the claim. And while those contracts aren't bad, they were coming off 14 and 17 point seasons, so right or not, their earning potential was limited. Lou has signed a lot more than just those two.
Dekes wtf you doing using "raw points" to evaluate players???Best defense tandem in the league? That's quite the claim. And while those contracts aren't bad, they were coming off 14 and 17 point seasons, so right or not, their earning potential was limited. Lou has signed a lot more than just those two.
So who are the others in the top-10, and how much do those pairings make?It's top 5, top 10 according to basically everybody. I don't think there's a clear-cut #1 pairing out there.
I'm not using raw points to evaluate players. I'm pointing out that their earning potential was limited by their production. Those aren't the contracts that are questionable though.Dekes wtf you doing using "raw points" to evaluate players???
I'm not using raw points to evaluate players. I'm pointing out that their earning potential was limited by their production.
So who are the others in the top-10, and how much do those pairings make?
I'm not using raw points to evaluate players. I'm pointing out that their earning potential was limited by their production. These two aren't really the contracts that are questionable anyway.
I use the same criteria for everybody, but I'm not assessing players. I'm pointing out the limited earning potential of two players somebody else brought up to make a broad, highly questionable claim about a GM's negotiating abilities.You're clearly not using the same criteria that you use for assessing Leafs players