Interesting details from the Buffalo/Vancouver game:
Down 1 with two minutes to go, Sabres got two consecutive offensive zone faceoffs. The player they chose to take both of those faceoffs was Jeff Skinner.
Vancouver, defending their lead, put Ethan Bear on the ice for the final shift.
Remember when Elias Lindholm was a bust because he only put up 40 point seasons as a teenager/early 20s year old? Despite clearly showing tons of talent and defensive responsibility? No, not the talent but he has shown in Calgary but the talent anyone who has watched hockey for a long time knew would probably translate to the player he is now.It, along with Geekie's recent run, goes to show you that not being the best fit for a loaded Carolina squad is not at all the same thing as not being an NHL player.
Interesting details from the Buffalo/Vancouver game:
Down 1 with two minutes to go, Sabres got two consecutive offensive zone faceoffs. The player they chose to take both of those faceoffs was Jeff Skinner.
Vancouver, defending their lead, put Ethan Bear on the ice for the final shift.
It, along with Geekie's recent run, goes to show you that not being the best fit for a loaded Carolina squad is not at all the same thing as not being an NHL player.
I expected to see a lot more than 3 minors on Columbus when I read this.DeAngelo played 31 minutes in Philly's OT loss to Columbus. Damn near half the game.
Bill Peters has taught you well young Padawan (skinner)
It still blows my mind how many of our old players are carving out roles around the league and not just on bottom feeders. Guys on teams like TB and VGK. Maybe we should incorporate some of them and enjoy cap savings instead of signing a Stastny or Kase. Then we'd have more cap for a big dick trade.
Geekie was selected in the expansion draft. I don't think they really wanted to lose him but they had to make players availableThis is the internet so I'll nitpick...didn't Geekie move on because he was one of the most obvious choices to expose for the expansion draft?
This is the internet so I'll nitpick...didn't Geekie move on because he was one of the most obvious choices to expose for the expansion draft?
Listerine makes sense...but who wouldn't through in a lot of their 3rd tier prospects for a 50 pt 2c.
I don't even remember why we let Roy go at this point...was he part of the Haula trade on the quest to find a 2c?
I still really wish Carrick had made it. He’s still toiling away in the ahl where he’s a pretty big point producer.I guess the other side of that coin is we don’t know which guys are going to thrive, and the middle of a contention window isn’t the time to guess wrong.
We could be sitting here with Trevor Carrick and Janne Kuokkanen in key roles, talking about how the Borg doesn’t know what the **** they’re doing.
I guess the other side of that coin is we don’t know which guys are going to thrive, and the middle of a contention window isn’t the time to guess wrong.
We could be sitting here with Trevor Carrick and Janne Kuokkanen in key roles, talking about how the Borg doesn’t know what the **** they’re doing.
If I recall correctly and I'm paraphrasing.That's fair but as experts the onus is on them to make the right choices. What % should we expect someone who is an expert to hit on?
To their credit they've done a great job hitting on goalies the last few years which was probably the biggest failure of the RF years.
Not sure why this is a surprise, the Canes traded or let go players that scored over 70 goals last year or over 12 goals per every 15 games. They were replaced by Burns, Stasney, drury, Noesen and de Haan who have scored 6 In 16 games. Disastrous starts by TiVo, Jarvis and Koko balance it down to probably 10 goal per 15 games. Patches getting healthy will help but will not turn the tide. But this team just does not have the firepower as last years, even if the non performing players get on track. Thank goodness for Necas and Svetch or this season may be a disaster already.So the Canes have scored 10 less goals than expected over 15 games. Quite a difference from prior seasons.
Nobody said it was a surprise, particularly with Patches and Kase hurt (and now TT). I was responding to the comment that the Canes have had a lack of finish for the prior few years and showing that this year was different. But your comment about "70" goals is a tad bit misleading.Not sure why this is a surprise, the Canes traded or let go players that scored over 70 goals last year or over 12 goals per every 15 games. They were replaced by Burns, Stasney, drury, Noesen and de Haan who have scored 6 In 16 games. Disastrous starts by TiVo, Jarvis and Koko balance it down to probably 10 goal per 15 games. Patches getting healthy will help but will not turn the tide. But this team just does not have the firepower as last years, even if the non performing players get on track. Thank goodness for Necas and Svetch or this season may be a disaster already.
There’s been a bit of discussion on Twitter and other social that the reason many of our ex-players thrive post-Canes is that they are freed from the Canes style of play. On their new teams many are allowed to do what they do best and what comes most naturally to them vs being made to overly alter their skill set to get to play for the Canes…which can at times minimize their best contributions and assets especially on the offensive front.
Interesting...outside of Lindholm (who was very young with Canes), who has markedly improved after leaving the Canes?There’s been a bit of discussion on Twitter and other social that the reason many of our ex-players thrive post-Canes is that they are freed from the Canes style of play. On their new teams many are allowed to do what they do best and what comes most naturally to them vs being made to overly alter their skill set to get to play for the Canes…which can at times minimize their best contributions and assets especially on the offensive front.
There’s been a bit of discussion on Twitter and other social that the reason many of our ex-players thrive post-Canes is that they are freed from the Canes style of play. On their new teams many are allowed to do what they do best and what comes most naturally to them vs being made to overly alter their skill set to get to play for the Canes…which can at times minimize their best contributions and assets especially on the offensive front.
I think Hanifin has as well, although he was also quite young at the time of the trade.Interesting...outside of Lindholm (who was very young with Canes), who has markedly improved after leaving the Canes?
Some examples:
Nino has 7 goals, but only 4 out of his last 14 (which puts him on LY pace).
Tony D is producing less than LY with 20% more ice time,
Dougie similar to 2 or 3 years he was with the Canes,
Geekie had 22 points LY with Kraken and producing this year but perhaps it's just his time.
Trochuk is similar to LY despite playing much more PP time & also 10% more minutes this year.
I will try to find the post for the specific players...one poster has said more than once that it contributed to Tro going elsewhere...that it wasn't just the money.Which guys were they talking about? Dougie and TDA both played at their normal paces and Nino was almost ppg right after coming over when before he was a 40-50 pt player. He then regressed to his norm but I don't think we hurt any of those guys offense.
Without checking stats it seems Brock is doing about the same, perhaps a bit less?Who has really thrived after leaving the Canes style though?
Off the top of my head, I don't see a lot of guys that "thrived" once they left the confines of the Canes system. Am I missing someone?
I really liked Tro here but if he really wanted to leave because despite winning he couldnt live without scoring more goals than I am glad he moved on. No offense to the report but that really seem counter to most hockey culture where winning isnt everything, its the only thing.I will try to find the post for the specific players...one poster has said more than once that it contributed to Tro going elsewhere...that it wasn't just the money.