Around the League - 2023 Offseason Edition

Status
Not open for further replies.

LOFIN

Registered User
Sep 16, 2011
16,935
24,018
How does Tampa have a "dark future", unless we are talking about 10 years from now on lol. Their stars are not that old (compared to say the Penguins or Washington), and they are locked up to good deals for multiple years. I don't know about their prospect pool, but they usually draft well. They don't really have draft capital for next year and no first for 2025, but other than that they still have picks for the future. They can do a retool around their core.
 

henchman21

Mr. Meeseeks
Feb 24, 2012
67,095
53,592
How does Tampa have a "dark future", unless we are talking about 10 years from now on lol. Their stars are not that old (compared to say the Penguins or Washington), and they are locked up to good deals for multiple years. I don't know about their prospect pool, but they usually draft well. They don't really have draft capital for next year and no first for 2025, but other than that they still have picks for the future. They can do a retool around their core.
The core is getting pretty old actually (Hedman, Stamkos, and Kuch especially) and guys like Cernak have a lot of wear excessive of the miles. Then the pool does have some talent that is underrated, but it isn’t going to make up for things. Playoff team right now phasing out over the next 2-4 seasons. Then a full scale rebuild is needed. They won’t be able to retool at this point. Which is why they are spending to just hold on.
 

LOFIN

Registered User
Sep 16, 2011
16,935
24,018
The core is getting pretty old actually (Hedman, Stamkos, and Kuch especially) and guys like Cernak have a lot of wear excessive of the miles. Then the pool does have some talent that is underrated, but it isn’t going to make up for things. Playoff team right now phasing out over the next 2-4 seasons. Then a full scale rebuild is needed. They won’t be able to retool at this point. Which is why they are spending to just hold on.
I disagree with them getting old, at least if you lump them together with teams like Washington and Pittsburgh. Vasilevsky is 29, Hedman turns 33, Kucherov is 30, Point is 29, Stamkos is 33. That's still 4-5 years of your top players being pretty damn good.
 

Balthazar

I haven't talked to the trainers yet
Sponsor
Apr 25, 2006
52,264
56,601
I disagree with them getting old, at least if you lump them together with teams like Washington and Pittsburgh. Vasilevsky is 29, Hedman turns 33, Kucherov is 30, Point is 29, Stamkos is 33. That's still 4-5 years of your top players being pretty damn good.
That's old as f***

They may have one more shot next year but it's a very small one.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Frobbo

henchman21

Mr. Meeseeks
Feb 24, 2012
67,095
53,592
I disagree with them getting old, at least if you lump them together with teams like Washington and Pittsburgh. Vasilevsky is 29, Hedman turns 33, Kucherov is 30, Point is 29, Stamkos is 33. That's still 4-5 years of your top players being pretty damn good.

In hockey age... that's old AF.

Point is 27 though, he's got some time and so does Cirelli and Serg. Vasi is a generational goalie IMO, so he should last into his mid to late 30s (plus goalies just age weird in general). They'll be a playoff team for a bit (my guess is 3 years) just based on their super high floor... but I don't see them actually contending again. I think their pool is a bit underrated, but even assuming that, there isn't enough there to supplement. The future assets are gone or limited to spend enough to pull the needed pieces in. They had a fantastic run, but their days as a top team are over.

All that said, Vinik won't allow them to suck for long. I expect they'll bottom out for 2-3 seasons and he'll invest where ever he needs to get the team back up.
 
  • Like
Reactions: GeoRox89

TruePowerSlave

Registered User
Jun 27, 2015
7,566
9,170
Detroit has an easily top 5 pool (I’d say top 2 or 3) with buildable and tough to get pieces in the NHL. I could get swapping with Ottawa, but Detroit should be in the conversation. They’ll have the best defense in the league 3 years from now and 3 horses at center.
Right now Detroit has Seider and a bunch of prospects to build that best defense in the league, the established NHLers aren't anything special. All it takes is that guys don't hit their potential and they won't even get close to being that great of a group.
 

Hasbro

Family Friend
Sponsor
Apr 1, 2004
53,336
17,608
South Rectangle
That's old as f***

They may have one more shot next year but it's a very small one.
logans_run_blinking_5201.gif
 
  • Like
Reactions: Hennessy

henchman21

Mr. Meeseeks
Feb 24, 2012
67,095
53,592
Right now Detroit has Seider and a bunch of prospects to build that best defense in the league, the established NHLers aren't anything special. All it takes is that guys don't hit their potential and they won't even get close to being that great of a group.
Seider and Walman are absolutely legit guys today. People skip over Walman because he doesn't have flashy numbers, but he is a phenominal defensemen. Edvinsson and Wallinder both look like future top pairing guys with Edvinsson maybe having more (he's got star potential IMO), and both are on the cusp of making the show. Beyond them they have a plethora of guys who project as middle and bottom pairing guys, some with high end specialist capabilities (ASP being one).

IMO the Red Wings' future depends on Larkin, Danielson and Kasper. Larkin is a #1C, but not a high end one. So either both Danielson and Kasper have to be very good and Detroit runs 3 very good lines (and Larkin has to age well)... or one of Danielson or Kasper have to elevate to a higher level than Larkin. I personally think both have that potential, but it isn't a super likely outcome.
 

TruePowerSlave

Registered User
Jun 27, 2015
7,566
9,170
Seider and Walman are absolutely legit guys today. People skip over Walman because he doesn't have flashy numbers, but he is a phenominal defensemen. Edvinsson and Wallinder both look like future top pairing guys with Edvinsson maybe having more (he's got star potential IMO), and both are on the cusp of making the show. Beyond them they have a plethora of guys who project as middle and bottom pairing guys, some with high end specialist capabilities (ASP being one).
Sure, it has potential to be great. However, we have seen so many teams have potential and see their prospects not quite live up to expectations.

It's way too early to crown them the future best Dcore of the entire league imo.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Alienblood

henchman21

Mr. Meeseeks
Feb 24, 2012
67,095
53,592
Sure, it has potential to be great. However, we have seen so many teams have potential and see their prospects not quite live up to expectations.

It's way too early to crown them the future best Dcore of the entire league imo.

I mean... 3 years changes a lot. You could literally say any prediction is way too early, but what we do is speculate here.
 

henchman21

Mr. Meeseeks
Feb 24, 2012
67,095
53,592
View attachment 733463

Just got pinged about this job. What a joke. Especially if you look at the requirements. They want a degree and 5 years of experience.

I remember criticizing the Avs posting and that was 4x the salary range. Woof
It is rather insane how little professional sports pay to staff until they work near the top of a front office... then it is absurd how much they pay. :laugh:
 
  • Like
Reactions: The Moops

The Abusement Park

Registered User
Jan 18, 2016
35,146
26,349
Yeah until Kasper and Danielson actually hit, I don’t see how you can have them above the Sens personally. The C for detroit is dogshit right now, at least for contenders and teams potentially moving into contender levels.
 

Ceremony

How I choose to feel is how I am
Jun 8, 2012
114,303
17,392
I have no idea what "Full Stack Software Engineer" entails but 15 grand a year doesn't seem very fair.
 

henchman21

Mr. Meeseeks
Feb 24, 2012
67,095
53,592
12 weeks is 3 months. Season doesn't start for nearly 3 months. Doubt that LTIR plays any role in them landing Karlsson
He'll be 're-evaluated' in 12 weeks... but it isn't about Guentzel being on LTIR all year, it is about them being able to fit under the offseason cap, have it be manageable to work out before the season, and give time to work out a Petry deal as he his the current hangup (doesn't want to go to San Jose).

I have no idea what "Full Stack Software Engineer" entails but 15 grand a year doesn't seem very fair.
To be fair to Detroit, you could buy a house for ~2 years worth of salary. In Denver it might take 10. :laugh:
 
  • Haha
Reactions: The Moops

Balthazar

I haven't talked to the trainers yet
Sponsor
Apr 25, 2006
52,264
56,601
View attachment 733463

Just got pinged about this job. What a joke. Especially if you look at the requirements. They want a degree and 5 years of experience.

I remember criticizing the Avs posting and that was 4x the salary range. Woof
15k-35k for a full-stack software engineer. Gotta be a 1 day/week part-time job, at most.
 

MacKaRant

Registered User
Sponsor
Jul 27, 2021
2,494
3,808
View attachment 733463

Just got pinged about this job. What a joke. Especially if you look at the requirements. They want a degree and 5 years of experience.

I remember criticizing the Avs posting and that was 4x the salary range. Woof

Apprenticeship positions in the field pay more than that. I can't believe they expect someone with multiple years of experience to go for that salary. I guess because it's sports and there's one dude out there desperate to get foot in the door?
 
  • Like
Reactions: The Moops

LOFIN

Registered User
Sep 16, 2011
16,935
24,018
Apprenticeship positions in the field pay more than that. I can't believe they expect someone with multiple years of experience to go for that salary. I guess because it's sports and there's one dude out there desperate to get foot in the door?
Exactly why. They are counting on the fact that they can hire a fan, who will accept a lesser pay for his dream job.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad