- May 9, 2014
- 5,822
- 8,237
It’s propaganda. It’s socially acceptable propaganda (which is why people object to the term) in the US and it’s not as pointed as it is in China and Russia, its more subtle but that’s what it is. The same as daily ‘pledging the allegiance’, it’s designed to keep everyone on the same page. Don’t get me wrong I think the UK would benefit from a lot more national pride and at times I envy those traits in the US. However the military stuff at games when it’s so pointed how poorly vets on hard times are treated just iritates the hell out of me. The whole celebration of the military is very conditional. Paid for or not, you can’t say military support is ok, but LGBTQ+ isn’t, if your objections are based on the principle of supporting a cause. Imagine the shit show it a player said ‘I’m not wearing the camoflage jersey or the hockey fights cancer one‘.Yeah it’s pretty gross. It was reported years ago actually with the largest sums of cash going to the NFL with their jets flying over stadiums, and brainwashing impressionable teenagers. Even John McCain called it “paid patriotism”. So the next time the announcers talk about how much the military means to them or how much they appreciate everything, you’ll know it’s all bought and paid for.
BTW, no issue with the principle that he doesn’t have to wear the jersey, it’s his right. However I have the right to judge him for it, as well as any religion that has an issue with it also.