rocketman588
Registered User
- Jan 15, 2021
- 2,849
- 2,518
You called Kerfoot the 3C... he hasn't played C for us this year.
Who is Towes? Handzul, Finger, Knies and Towes?
Toews... 1.19 PTS/60, 5v5. That's legitimately bad production. I mean even Kampf is more productive at 1.22 PTS/60. David Kampf!!! Kerfoot is at 1.48 PTS/60.... the idea is to IMPROVE the bottom six, not make it worse.
Outside of faceoffs, Holmberg has been very good for us.... outside of Henrique, there isn't really much of an upgrade readily available. Given Holmberg has been good (other than faceoffs), we should probably focus on other areas..
So I'd rather have one of Jarnkrok, Engvall, or Kerfoot thAn, Meier, Tarasenko or Kane?
I don't really want Kane, more of what we have, and doesn't balance the team... Tarasenko is better.. but still not what we'd need. (If you hadn't noticed, he was traded already) In any case, Dubas stated today that he wouldn't trade firsts or Knies for rentals... these two are rentals.
Meier is very good, fits what we need.... but, he'd cost a ton, and we couldn't keep both him and the other top four next year. I don't see him either.
It's fine to want to improve upon the team... but maybe pay attention to where your own teams players are playing position wise, as well as looking at how shiny names like Toews are actually playing.
Hes not only played center but played it the last game we played against Boston. And is supposed to play C today.Do you even watch this team Jesus. I swear half this board just looks at stats on money puck to determine takes.
/60 stats are one of the most flawed you can possibly use which is why. Yes towes is a good fit because it balances our line up and allows Kampf to be used to make the 4th line a shut down line which we need.
Last edited: