I think they do actually, just in a different way we are used to seeing under DL. The Blake/Luc/Todd management has been a departure philosophically from DL in terms of accountability and style of hockey being played.
DL ran a pretty tight ship and demanded accountability as a professional. Not just NHLers but everyone in the system. Everyone on here knows the story of Quick being lazy and sleeping in/being late for practice in the ECHL. Ranford had to fly out there to get him into shape and form good habits. Ditto Kopitar etc.
The flip side, and I don’t blame DL but there were incidents that were piling up after the two cup wins. Drugs and domestic violence weren’t a good look for the org. I think those incidents had an impact on Luc/Blake in making it a more player friendly in the organization. I’m a little concerned how that kind of culture affects player development.
Does Quick become Quick or Kopitar become a great two way center under current management?