YP44
Registered User
CapFriendly has 8D, but also only 12 signed forwards. Subtract a D, but add Prokhorkin and Kempe eventually.
yup but this was about fitting kempe's eventual contract in so he is automatically added IMO
CapFriendly has 8D, but also only 12 signed forwards. Subtract a D, but add Prokhorkin and Kempe eventually.
Marner potentially off to Europe.
Dubas is the king.
Marner potentially off to Europe.
Dubas is the king.
Let Marner go to Europe. He isn't worth what he is asking.
Let Marner go to Europe. He isn't worth what he is asking.
What do you think he is asking? I'd like to know for a frame of reference, because I think the guy who has led his team in scoring by 6 points the last 2 seasons is worth quite a bit.
I honestly believe the biggest mistake by Dubas was signing Tavares and not locking up Matthews and Marner long term around 10 million.
They went for it in the ELC window. Just like Edmonton and Winnipeg. Didn't work, and now they just have too many guys making too much money. To sign Tavares, before you have your two big players signed, after you already went through a hassle with a third young player, who isn't as good as the main two young guys, was probably a mistake. Sometimes you have to take your shot though.
What's interesting is whenever they figure out the Marner stuff, after this season, they might have to rebuild basically their entire defense. With a #1 goalie that will be a UFA a year after that.
Bit of a tough spot. They might have to take the hit and trade someone, probably at a talent-loss, for a couple depth players making $4-5m. Which, could make them better overall, or it could be the new Gilmour non-call against Gretzky, where they never let it go.
Salary caps, what can you do?
I think the approach Edmonton took was interesting with Draistl and McDavid. The problem is once a team's best players get paid the other players on the roster try to negotiate off those numbers, which management should not allow. It was an interesting experiment, but doesn't look like it is going to work out.I dunno, I mean, I was told it was easy as long as you didn't overpay veterans for past performance, you just have to pay guys before you win since that's when they're worth it and...oh.
Maybe the Leafs should consider Matthews, Tavares, and Reilly as their core players. They might not have the star power, but be a better team if they move Marner out for more depth. Any competent winger playing with Matthews or Tavares is going to put up decent numbers.Apparently Marner's speaking with Switzerland is just to train. Either way, it doesn't look good when you promise the fans you won't lose any core players and your hands are tied with one of them.
I dunno, I mean, I was told it was easy as long as you didn't overpay veterans for past performance, you just have to pay guys before you win since that's when they're worth it and...oh.
What do you think he is asking? I'd like to know for a frame of reference, because I think the guy who has led his team in scoring by 6 points the last 2 seasons is worth quite a bit.
I honestly believe the biggest mistake by Dubas was signing Tavares and not locking up Matthews and Marner long term around 10 million.
wow... leafs fans really trashing dreger in the main boards
Part of the problem is as soon as a GM for any team makes a mistake and overpays for a player, the agents of other players want to negotiate off that number as if it is the new market price. GMs are going to have to learn to reject that kind of thinking.I'm surprised at how many FA's still aren't signed. Flyers still have 2 to ink, Konecky (supposedly close to signing at 2/3 yrs , 4.5 per, which is fair)
and Provorov, which is getting ugly. His agent wants way too much and Flyers aren't budging. And until Werenski and McAvoy sign, I don't think they will.
I think the approach Edmonton took was interesting with Draistl and McDavid. The problem is once a team's best players get paid the other players on the roster try to negotiate off those numbers, which management should not allow. It was an interesting experiment, but doesn't look like it is going to work out.
If you are going to pay anyone on their second contracts it should be guys like McDavid and Matthews. If you are the GM you can't let the agents of other players come in and negotiate off those numbers, which is what happened in Toronto. Matthews is a better player than Marner in my opinion, and fills a much more valuable role.
At this point the Leafs would be better off trading Marner in a two-for-one, or three-for-one deal and filling some of their holes. They would have better depth and be a more balanced team. They arguably have two of the top five centers in the NHL. Trade Marner to add a solid winger and a solid defenseman.
wow... leafs fans really trashing dreger in the main boards
according to the Toronto Star, Marner wants 5 yrs/11.6 M per