Around the League '15-'16: PP Points Don't Count Edition

  • Xenforo Cloud will be upgrading us to version 2.3.5 on March 3rd at 12 AM GMT. This version has increased stability and fixes several bugs. We expect downtime for the duration of the update. The admin team will continue to work on existing issues, templates and upgrade all necessary available addons to minimize impact of this new version. Click Here for Updates
Status
Not open for further replies.
Losing?

I wouldn't underestimate any team going into the playoffs. One thing the Kings have showed us over the years, that come playoff time, they can flip the switch. No reason why a team like CHI wouldn't do the same thing, especially being a team that knows how to win more than anyone in the league right now.

I think he meant what are the odds of that happening, not what are the possible consequences of that happening.

I totally agree though, but it would figure our reward for our potential best season ever would be...Chicago. Do not want that to happen.
 
Number 1 seed is anyone's to get.

I think Kings have the best shot. 1-2 games in hand on the top 3 central teams.

Dallas just lost Seguin.
Hawks aren't playing as well as expected.
St. Louis has the best chance of the 3 central teams. They aren't playing or hurt as bad as the other two.

If the Kings get the #1, I don't see the Hawks falling 12 points to Colorado/Minnesota.
Wouldn't that be interesting. Getting Minnesota and Stoll.
 
What the risk of us facing Chicago in 1st round? They seem to be falling like a rock.

I would even say those are slim odds but not impossible by any means.
Nashville has to gain 4 points over a 10 game stretch. They are only 3 back but don't hold the tie breaker. And in order to get that first tie breaker Chicago would have to fall off the map. That is 7 ROW in 10 games gained.
But if Nashville continues like they have in the last 10 and Chicago does like they have in the last 10 it would happen.
 
I actually think that Anaheim might be the biggest test for the Kings come playoffs. Sure, they beat them in Game 7 in 2014 but their roster has changed quite a bit since then, as has LA's.

Not saying Chicago is a pushover, but I find that the Ducks may be stingier defensively and are a tighter checking and heavier team. Plus we all know how unsuccessful the Kings have been against the Ducks during the regular season over the past two years, and their top stars have produced against the Kings.

May the Sharks and Ducks beat the crap out of each other in the 1st round.
 
I actually think that Anaheim might be the biggest test for the Kings come playoffs. Sure, they beat them in Game 7 in 2014 but their roster has changed quite a bit since then, as has LA's.

Not saying Chicago is a pushover, but I find that the Ducks may be stingier defensively and are a tighter checking and heavier team. Plus we all know how unsuccessful the Kings have been against the Ducks during the regular season over the past two years, and their top stars have produced against the Kings.

May the Sharks and Ducks beat the crap out of each other in the 1st round.

Agreed. And the ducks, like the sharks, have extra incentive to beat us. Crossing my fingers we get Gaborik back and in good shape by playoff time.
 
I actually think that Anaheim might be the biggest test for the Kings come playoffs. Sure, they beat them in Game 7 in 2014 but their roster has changed quite a bit since then, as has LA's.

Not saying Chicago is a pushover, but I find that the Ducks may be stingier defensively and are a tighter checking and heavier team. Plus we all know how unsuccessful the Kings have been against the Ducks during the regular season over the past two years, and their top stars have produced against the Kings.

May the Sharks and Ducks beat the crap out of each other in the 1st round.

agreed.
Who would you rather face round 1 the sharks or the Blues, Hawks, Preds, or stars?

Ideal situation is to finish first in the west, but I think my second choice maybe losing the division and playing the sharks
 
I actually think that Anaheim might be the biggest test for the Kings come playoffs. Sure, they beat them in Game 7 in 2014 but their roster has changed quite a bit since then, as has LA's.

Not saying Chicago is a pushover, but I find that the Ducks may be stingier defensively and are a tighter checking and heavier team. Plus we all know how unsuccessful the Kings have been against the Ducks during the regular season over the past two years, and their top stars have produced against the Kings.

May the Sharks and Ducks beat the crap out of each other in the 1st round.

Agreed. And I would add that of the two playoff matchups against ANA & CHI in 2014, ANA was more difficult. (except for game 7, of course)
 
alright,
Preds, Hawks, Blues or Sharks?

Pick your poison am I right? I don't care at this point, it's gonna be difficult either way.

Doughty said last night that they really want to win the conference, since it never has been done so they know what lies ahead if they win.
 
I mean they've done it from the bottom of the bracket, why not do it from the top for fun right? Go big or go home, let's take the conference.
 
I'm pretty sure Chicago is going to do everything they can to avoid facing us in the 1st round. They don't want to play us as much as we don't want to play them.
 
I mean they've done it from the bottom of the bracket, why not do it from the top for fun right? Go big or go home, let's take the conference.

Would be the most Kings thing ever to draw so tough from the top of the bracket after the Ducks last year got to creampuff their way through Calgary and Winnipeg :laugh:
 
Would be the most Kings thing ever to draw so tough from the top of the bracket after the Ducks last year got to creampuff their way through Calgary and Winnipeg :laugh:
Last year Vancouver, Calgary and Winnipeg made the playoffs. With all due respect to those teams/guys, they were contending only in the hearts of their fans. Reality was dark, very dark and based on this years results quite harsh...
 
This may not be the right place to put this, but in terms of player management and temperment, Sutter might be a perfect coach. I competed for several years, as well as coached, and one thing my coach always taught me was, "Never high, never low." Maintaining even emotion and focus throughout good and bad times is critical to consistency. Check out this quote from Sutter, after a 14-5 goals f/a win streak:

On whether the team is playing its best hockey of the season:
You guys are basing it lots on goals because we’ve scored some goals lately. [Reporter: But you’re winning.] Well, Jeez, after the New Jersey game I thought the sky was falling. We’re getting close to accomplish what we want, so we want to get it. We’ve gone through a stretch here where we’re playing top teams or teams that are shutting down teams, and everybody’s different, so we’re just trying to adjust to that and not get away from our game. Again, it’s a stretch of the schedule that as a coach you have to manage it properly too, in terms of how you’re using guys out there. If somebody’s not pulling their weight, we’re not going to look very good, so to say that we’re playing better than at any point, I don’t think that. I think that maybe as a group we are, but I think that we have guys that have to raise their games substantially for us to go to another level there.

Guy is still calling out players after all of this. :laugh:

Sutter is also the first guy to say his team played well after a rough game. :nod:

I think its easy to take him for granted, but he is a really good coach.
 
When they're on their game (which they have been), the Kings can beat anyone. Anyone, anywhere. Bring on the Capitals and Blackhawks on the ****ing Moon.
 
Last edited:
Welp, unless they pull some magic out, we're going to get a pissed off bruins tomorrow night.

Two dumbass goals in under five minutes for the ducks.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad