Lets keep it from getting too political in here like it did there. People will have different views that discussion on a hockey board won't solve.
That being said, I may be in the minority, but I don't feel it was a 'political' issue. If it were, I couldn't see a sports organization sponsoring it. What the idea of it was is supporting equality in hockey, not advocating for gay marriage or liberal values or anything like that. To make that leap, you have to politicize it with your own agenda, in my humble opinion. I don't see the idea as fundamentally different from promoting black athletes in hockey to help bring further diversity, or running clinics in China. You're not forcing anything on anyone, you're just saying that when we're on the ice, we're all equal.
Athletes can and will have their own views elsewhere. Tim Thomas is obviously super conservative but I doubt he'd speak out against a gay teammate. May not approve of his lifestyle elsewhere but the idea is to make the locker room and thus the sport more comfortable so people in general aren't shut out. Simply put, it's stupid to have segregation of any type in any sport. That's all I'm saying and that's all I saw this as.