Boom Boom Apathy
I am the Professor. Deal with it!
- Sep 6, 2006
- 49,331
- 102,075
I'm not picking a side, and I generally have no issue with arguing just to argue, but I can kinda see both sides of this one.
IMO, Eberle gets a bad rap for one reason or another. Maybe he can't get the stench of Edmonton off of him. And Skinner gets a pass for one reason or another, seemingly emerging blameless from his teams' failure to make the playoffs for nine straight seasons. IMO, they are close enough in value that one shouldn't be making $3.5 million per season more than the other. To me, it shows that Skinner was quite comfortable using every ounce of leverage to his financial benefit, while Eberle -- for one reason or another, known only to him -- didn't.
Probably because Skinner was coming off a 40 Goal season and Eberle was coming off of a 37 point seasons.
I wasn't arguing that Skinner is $3.5M > Eberle. I was disagreeing with the statement that they are "similar" players that DBT made. Other than raw points, they aren't similar in terms of style, strengths and how they play.
Anyhow, it doesn't matter to me because I'm just glad we aren't the team paying Skinner that contract.
EDIT: Funny how the trade got viewed after Skinner signed. Universally, the trade of Skinner was panned by fans and media as the Canes getting screwed. Now, Skinner cost the Sabres $9M/year for 8 years (with a NMC) and everyone is panning the Sabres for giving him that contract.