After watching Parssinen, Glass and Novak, what we have seen of Tomasino, Evangelista and adding Kemel . Im going to say offensively we’ve never had a prospect pool like this. And far from empty
How has Tomasino looked since he came back from injury?After watching Parssinen, Glass and Novak, what we have seen of Tomasino, Evangelista and adding Kemel . Im going to say offensively we’ve never had a prospect pool like this. And far from empty
I have no idea, I was more speaking to his talent level as a prospectHow has Tomasino looked since he came back from injury?
Agreed. Hopefully we can get an update from the Milwaukee people.I have no idea, I was more speaking to his talent level as a prospect
<insert 6'5" joke... >Not really much to say tonight other than complete domination from start to finish. Markus Nurmi continues to stand out to me every time I watch him.
For futures or would we be looking to get a Dman back? If we trade him and dont get anyone who plays? Gross?I’m betting Fabbro is traded soon
Probably Gross but who knows what Poile would be wanting.For futures or would we be looking to get a Dman back? If we trade him and dont get anyone who plays? Gross?
Anyway fabbro could get a 1st?Probably Gross but who knows what Poile would be wanting.
Probably but knowing Poile he would go for a better prospect instead.Anyway fabbro could get a 1st?
Can you be. More specific?Fabbro is wearing me out with his play. Wonder what we could get in trade
Have no idea where you got that I was anti Arvy in fact I was one of the few that was pulling for him to be kept after camp and send Fisla back down. The thing you could be referring to was the next year when there was a glut of small players Jarnkrok, Arvy, Fiala, Ellis. As I recall that line of debate I too the side that a team could protect one or two small guys but not all four. I still stand by that I was never anti Kunin even after his production dropped I wanted him to succeed. Johansen is too lazy and who knows what motivates the guy, because when he wants too he can be a 1C the issue is he rarely wants too. Now as to Trotz never having a 1C Jason Arnott says hello. Was he the elite 1C no but he was a knotch up from Legwand. Now I agree Trotz was never given a roster as good as Lavi was but in no way would I consider ANY roster n Nashville stacked. They have had stacked D and elite goal tending and ample scoring but stacked top to bottom nope. As to Hynes the guy was a bad hire from day one. Poiles nepotism resulted in that hire. The guy is going to be fired at some point, at this point none of us are sure Poile has permission to fire the guy from ownership or if he has dug his heals in wanting to keep Hynes. If it were most any other team in the league Hynes would be gone now.I thought the issue was Fiala, then Arvidsson, then Kunin. But it sounds like it is Joey? Sure he can be a little lazy but which Pred is not lazy at times? Only a few will fall into that category. Trotz was never given a true 1C and a loaded roster like Lavy had and what did Lavy do. Players started to not play or the system started to fail and the result ended with Lavy gone. Hynes has had the players he wanted and let go the ones he didn't want and the play has suffered because of it... and he is still the coach. That is on GMDP.
Wasteful is one word for it.Fabbro is fine, he’s just a victim of our depth. Same thing happened with Seth Jones but he held 10x the value fabs does. If we can get an equal forward prospect for him that’s fine. But I honestly don’t see the need to move him at all. If we just move out all our young players for Hynes only to fire him after alll this, which he will be sooner than later, it would be so wasteful.
I like him and don't want to see him traded, but I'm also not sure how high his is ceiling is at this point. Serviceable #4 if paired with a good #3 but a bottom pairing guy if he has to carry the pairing I guess? They seem to think more of a Carrier.Fabs is a victim of recency bias. When the general Perd fan thinks of him, they think of the goals against he's been on the ice for.