Viqsi
"that chick from Ohio"
As I understand it, Sznadjer himself (along with some friends, IIRC) is doing it by reviewing footage of games. I don't know if they manage to get all games or just a representative sample (if it was all games, that'd be a hell of an accomplishment).What is this Crayola advertisement actually saying!?!?
Oh, ok, new and MORE IMPORTANT question…
WHO or HOW are they keeping track of these “Botched Retrievals and Failed Exits”??
I know Sznadjer is pretty well respected for his work in this area but I've never tried validating it myself.There was a breakdown/set of posts done years ago showing that these “advanced statistics” can’t even get the shot locations down accurately, and the related shot danger values given were shown to consistently be highly inaccurate and most of the time lacking context or logic altogether.
Valid, but getting the puck out of the zone is usually the last step in ending sustained pressure (and we failed miserably at it constantly last year), so I wouldn't write that off out of hand. It's possible to overrate that part (since it's a measurable and so folks trying to do statistical analysis will pounce on it when available), and evaluating that as an individual skill rather than a team skill or a chemistry evaluation strikes me as a tad disingenuous, but it's at least worthwhile to look at.That said, I’m still less interested in how good our defense breaks the puck out of the zone, and still more worried about how they play when the OTHER team is breaking INTO the zone, and during sustained pressure DEFENSIVELY.