I was wondering this morning about that. Will they be content with 2 unprovens in Ignatiew & Murphy?
I think Dansk might be done, but I could see us pick up another guy around 26 with a couple years AHL experience. I would prefer that goalie to be a throw in in a deal for say Mang, instead of us trading a 3rd.
I think there's two ways to go about it.
1. Acquire a goalie that has experience with a starter workload via a Vladar (maybe+) swap.
A. Someone actually decent (ie: Jarry suggestion on trade boards)
B. Someone who is pure cannon fodder and given the net only when Wolf needs rest and to be sheltered from bad developmental habits (ie: Korpisalo)
2. Acquire a young goalie with serious upside that can start in the AHL (but not waiver exempt). Once called up you do have to worry about losing one. Goalies like this are kinda like Wolf though. I think you'd have to consider losing Vladar to waivers as a possibility if you acquire a guy like this (ie: Silovs, Knight)
3. Acquire an ultra young goalie who is waiver exempt. NHL upside or not, doesn't matter. Wolf and V take all the starts, this goalie is for emergencies only.
4. Acquire a journeyman goalie for the NHL/AHL that no one would basically care about. Call up in emergencies, send back down to AHL.
A. Could potentially lose them. (ie: Pickard, Brossoit, Dansk, other etc.)
B. Reverse UNO. Vladar starts in AHL as conditioning stint or otherwise and has to earn his way back up.
Note: None of the goalies above are the trade targets in mind. I'm just listing them as examples of goalies of that calibre and/or situation.