Are the Toronto Maple Leafs Stanley Cup contenders?

Status
Not open for further replies.

TheNumber4

Registered User
Nov 11, 2011
44,235
55,170
This never fails to make me laugh. A supposed contender takes on a salary cap dump as their starter from one of the worst teams in the league.

The backup plan? A goalie with known attitude issues that another team walked away from, and said team was searching for a solution.

What a f***ing tandem

What’s even more ridiculous is that while they were doing that master plan of goaltending solutions. They criticized the Oilers for a young up and comer in Skinner and having a 2M Smith putting up .923 and .914.
 

nhlfan9191

Registered User
Aug 4, 2010
20,014
18,221
His point still stands.....the leafs have treated the goaltending position almost as an after thought. When was their last real stud? Belfour?
Posters boys up front getting their cookies is the teams focus and identity. A coaches nightmare.


and Ovechkin totally agrees.
Freddy Andersen was a good goalie for the Leafs in my opinion. The injuries started to catch up with him near the end, but I felt he became a scapegoat for them a lot of years.
 

PaulD

71,73,76,77,78,79,86,93
Feb 4, 2016
31,418
18,482
Dundas
Freddy Andersen was a good goalie for the Leafs in my opinion. The injuries started to catch up with him near the end, but I felt he became a scapegoat for them a lot of years.
Lou acquired Freddie and you are right ....he was quality. Bruins got to him in back to back games 7s is all. No shame there. But he won them a lot of games. Kept them in games too. Leafs have not been able to match Freddie since
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: nhlfan9191

jcs0218

Registered User
Apr 20, 2018
7,968
9,882
It’s not surprising.

The Leafs have to play him due to injuries is exactly my point.

Take any team in the league and give them below .900 goaltending and most of them are going to start losing games.

Usually teams don’t have a third string NHL-calibre goalie.
Why do you think the Maple Leafs are forced to use such bad goaltenders?
 

TheNumber4

Registered User
Nov 11, 2011
44,235
55,170
Lou acquired Freddie and you are right ....he was quality. Bruins got to him in back to back games 7s is all. No shame there. But he won them a lot of games. Kept them in games too. Leafs have not been able to match Freddie since
Freddy Andersen was a good goalie for the Leafs in my opinion. The injuries started to catch up with him near the end, but I felt he became a scapegoat for them a lot of years.

Getting rid of Freddie or letting him walk was one of my favourite Leafs self-owns. I agree, he was a good goaltender. Media and fanbase complaints made sure he was a goner though.
 
  • Like
Reactions: nturn06

Sidney the Kidney

One last time
Jun 29, 2009
56,764
49,182
Sure - it worked for Tampa with Vasi.
What are you talking about? Vasilievkiy didn't suffer 3 major injuries in his first 4 seasons in the league. How's that comparable to Woll's injury history?

Also, he wasn't handed the reigns until after he'd proven he could perform in the playoffs, the year he took over for Ben Bishop when Bishop got hurt. Tampa didn't go into the year expecting a totally inexperienced (and injury prone) goalie to be their #1.
 

Divine

Registered User
Dec 18, 2010
19,243
13,457
Tampa didn't go into the year expecting a totally inexperienced (and injury prone) goalie to be their #1.

Neither did Pittsburgh when Matt Murray was called up from the minors to win the Cup or STL when Binnington showed up from the AHL to win the Cup or who expected Adin Hill to win the Stanley Cup last year?

I don't think planning to play the goalie who had a .932 save percentage last year in a tandem with the goalie who had a .919 save percentage last year was a bad idea. Whoever played better can start in the playoffs. Woll's numbers were better in the regular season and playoffs last year than Samsonov's - which is why they wanted to give him a chance. I don't think it's unreasonable to do that.

The problem occurred when Samsonov declined significantly and Woll got injured. Now you have to play your third string goaltender.
 

Sidney the Kidney

One last time
Jun 29, 2009
56,764
49,182
Neither did Pittsburgh when Matt Murray was called up from the minors to win the Cup or STL when Binnington showed up from the AHL to win the Cup or who expected Adin Hill to win the Stanley Cup last year?

I don't think planning to play the goalie who had a .932 save percentage last year in a tandem with the goalie who had a .919 save percentage last year was a bad idea. Whoever played better can start in the playoffs. Woll's numbers were better in the regular season and playoffs last year than Samsonov's - which is why they wanted to give him a chance. I don't think it's unreasonable to do that.

The problem occurred when Samsonov declined significantly and Woll got injured. Now you have to play your third string goaltender.
How is the Woll situation similar to Vasilevskiy though? You cited Tampa and Vasilevskiy as a perfect comparable situation for Woll and the Leafs going into this season. When they became the team's #1 goalie and what circumstances lead to it happening aren't even remotely close.

Also, Murray wasn't penciled in as the Pens' #1. He took over when Fleury got hurt and they kept running with him because he was playing well. That's not the same as your assertion that the Leafs' plan all along was the #1 job was Woll's and not Samsonov's coming into this season.
 

Divine

Registered User
Dec 18, 2010
19,243
13,457
How is the Woll situation similar to Vasilevskiy though? You cited Tampa and Vasilevskiy as a perfect comparable situation for Woll and the Leafs going into this season. When they became the team's #1 goalie and what circumstances lead to it happening aren't even remotely close.

Also, Murray wasn't penciled in as the Pens' #1. He took over when Fleury got hurt and they kept running with him because he was playing well. That's not the same as your assertion that the Leafs' plan all along was the #1 job was Woll's and not Samsonov's coming into this season.

Vasi was injured early in his career.

A poster was saying a goalie who is injured can never be counted on to be healthy is where I said it worked out well for Vasi.

My assertion wasn't for the Leafs. I don't work for the team. The plan was to play both goalies and ride the hot goaltender. I believed Woll to be better than Samsonov. I don't understand what you think the Leafs did wrong here?

Let me present the facts:

They had a 25 year old goalie who put up a .919 save percentage last year
They had a 24 year old goalie who put up a .932 save percentage last year

Did you want them to trade one of them and get a veteran guy or something? I don't see what's so egregious about riding that tandem and playing the better goalie?
 

Devonator

Registered User
Jan 5, 2003
4,845
2,685
Hm. They traded for a Top 4D in McCabe last year. And they added Domi, Reeves, and Bertuzzi as sand paper types already. Maybe just maybe there’s an issue with the core 4.
Come on....I am talking about serious talent not the dross they picked up last year.....
 

GirardSpinorama

Registered User
Aug 20, 2004
21,816
10,811
Vasi was injured early in his career.

A poster was saying a goalie who is injured can never be counted on to be healthy is where I said it worked out well for Vasi.

My assertion wasn't for the Leafs. I don't work for the team. The plan was to play both goalies and ride the hot goaltender. I believed Woll to be better than Samsonov. I don't understand what you think the Leafs did wrong here?

Let me present the facts:

They had a 25 year old goalie who put up a .919 save percentage last year
They had a 24 year old goalie who put up a .932 save percentage last year

Did you want them to trade one of them and get a veteran guy or something? I don't see what's so egregious about riding that tandem and playing the better goalie?
The 24 year old goalie had a .907 in the AHL just the year prior.
 

PaulD

71,73,76,77,78,79,86,93
Feb 4, 2016
31,418
18,482
Dundas
They absolutely shouldn’t re-sign Marner. You know he will want more than Nylander, which will be 12+ most likely. Leafs need to go in a different direction. Nylander and Marner at more than 23 million combined is lunacy. These wingers ain’t gonna get you to the promised land. Not at those numbers.
Marner and his soft perimeter game is as good as gone.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Suntouchable13
Dec 15, 2002
29,289
8,728
Hm. They traded for a Top 4D in McCabe last year. And they added Domi, Reeves, and Bertuzzi as sand paper types already. Maybe just maybe there’s an issue with the core 4.
Reaves is a "sand paper" type. Bertuzzi and Domi, .... no. Their fathers? Yes. Domi can still fill a useful spot on the 3rd line, I don't' know what Bertuzzi is doing on that roster other than "we hope he'll become more like his dad."

Corey Perry to the Leafs would do wonders for the Leafs, but I can't see the Leafs doing that.
 

Dr Pepper

Registered User
Dec 9, 2005
71,392
17,059
Sunny Etobicoke
Reaves is a "sand paper" type. Bertuzzi and Domi, .... no. Their fathers? Yes. Domi can still fill a useful spot on the 3rd line, I don't' know what Bertuzzi is doing on that roster other than "we hope he'll become more like his dad."

Corey Perry to the Leafs would do wonders for the Leafs, but I can't see the Leafs doing that.

Tyler is actually Todd's nephew.

Not sure if his dad ever made it to the bigs.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Ted Hoffman

94 Oil Drops

Copa o Muerte
Sep 19, 2019
5,302
8,245
Alberta
Nope. They'll be first round cannon fodders (again) if they make the playoffs unless they make a big trade to get a really good goalie and the core buys in committing to work their bums off.

In order to have a good chance of making it to the playoffs in the first place, they'll have to fire Keefe and get a nice coach bump. I don't get why that goof has been employed as long as he has. If I'm a Leafs fan, I'd be absolutely furious right now.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad