Right but what were people saying about our future in the 30’s and 40’s? The balance of the world was up for grabs and things could’ve been very very different than they are now. Social upheaval in the western world, the invention of nuclear weapons and living under the threat of them, disease, hunger, economic downturn…yet people carried on living.
There are always challenges to be met and overcome. Ingenuity and innovation will have to save us as will the price correction of renewable energies. We’re clearly not capable of reigning in our disgusting amount of consumption and waste. I wish that weren’t the case but it’s not possible to change human nature I guess.
I’m hoping nuclear and fission energy will be able to safely materialize in the coming decades to meet our energy requirements. Who knows what the world will be like in the future but that’s always the case and always will be. It’s not a legitimate reason to not want children.
>>Right but what were people saying about our future in the 30’s and 40’s? The balance of the world was up for grabs and things could’ve been very very different than they are now.
This is an odd statement. There were a whole lot of people in Europe in the '30s and early '40s who had to weigh the rise of fascism against their desire to start families, and for millions of them it ended in the worst way possible.
>>Social upheaval in the western world
Empty expression that doesn't really mean anything pertaining to this discussion.
>> the invention of nuclear weapons and living under the threat of them
If anything, nuclear weapons and the certainty of mutual destruction have been essential to preventing worldwide conflict.
>> Ingenuity and innovation will have to save us
It's a nice thought. As my old boss would say, hoping things work out isn't a plan.
>>Who knows what the world will be like in the future but that’s always the case and always will be.
We actually have a very good idea of what the world will look like in the future. It's bleak. Again, the damage is escalating before our very eyes.
>> It’s not a legitimate reason to not want children.
Not wanting children to suffer through the catastrophic effects of climate change seems pretty legit to me. It's a personal decision. But let's not kid ourselves.