Speculation: Any interest in Liljegren for a mid round pick?

WetcoastOrca

HFBoards Sponsor
Sponsor
Jun 3, 2011
40,022
25,759
Vancouver, BC
He was a solid top RD when Rielly was suspended last year and Keefe was forced to play him properly:
Morgan Rielly’s Suspension Sparking Maple Leafs’ Best Stretch - The Hockey Writers Latest News, Analysis & More
...and this year in training camp achieved growth from last year:
I doubt a young Bobby Orr would have played to his potential under a coach like Keefe.
Ignoring the hyperbole on Orr, here’s what Berube had to say on his training camp:

‘Craig Berube on Timothy Liljegren’s camp showing: “Has to do things quicker, be a little heavier in his battles, move pucks quicker, and simplify the game”
 

Michoulicious

Registered User
Dec 9, 2014
7,514
8,261
Not sure who would give any asset for a D that makes 3 millions and can't get into Toronto very mid top 6.

Maybe Columbus so they can get closer to the floor?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Prairie Habs

SeanMoneyHands

Registered User
Apr 18, 2019
15,323
14,720
He could still turn out to be a low end #4 dman for Toronto but he's overpaid. He's an okay defenseman but not particularly great at anything.
 
  • Like
Reactions: WetcoastOrca

Albus Dumbledore

Master of Death
Mar 28, 2015
9,041
2,688
It would be premature to deal Lily at this stage. Ive been a fan since we drafted the kid.He plays a position the leafs have struggled to put good players in(Top 4 RHD role) for a decade plus.He was for the most part a top 4 dman last year who paced for 34 points. Trading him now would be the dumbest thing to do.
 

Mattb124

Registered User
Apr 29, 2011
6,818
4,424
Rutta 50% retained, and a pick was the first thing I thought of when reading this thread.

Leafs get a replacement player at a much lower cap hit. Sharks get a guy that can grow on a rebuilding team, for a minimal price.
Which team is retaining and how does TOR pay for that?
 

bert

Registered User
Nov 11, 2002
37,576
23,898
Visit site
no, he is getting 3 mil per yr and looking like a 7th D man, I have a feeling no one is going to pay much for a bottom pair guy making 3 mil
That's negative value if he isn't a top 4 guy.

I don't know the return but it's delusional to think there aren't teams that would take a chance on him.

A 25 year-old RD with a few years of NHL experience and 2 years on his deal @ 3M? That's a low risk gamble with potentially a decent (but modest) upside for a GM that needs help on the (right side) blueline.
Delusional you mean like when Boqvist, Lundqvist, Branntsrom all weren't qualified this offseason because they would have made 2 + million. Less than Little Timothy. Maybe follow the league and familiarize yourself with more teams than the leafs. Teams don't want to pay 3rd pair d men 3 million dollars let alone 2.
 

bert

Registered User
Nov 11, 2002
37,576
23,898
Visit site
There are still a lot of GMs in the league that are too dumb NOT to offer this or more. The same group having to explain to their bosses why they didn't acquire Nick Robertson when they could have got him for table scraps.
Lol there are d men on waivers making league minimum that can play the same role. Expand your view of hockey outside of the Toronto Maple leafs. There's 32 teams in the league.
 

Fatass

Registered User
Apr 17, 2017
23,953
15,665
Lilly needs to be on the top pair with Ozone starts and #1 PP minutes. Honestly I would dump Reiilly and save the $7.5m and promote Lilly, but it's not gonna happen. He is totally misused and wasted as a 3rd pair dman.
Lilly is 200 pounds and 6’1”. He’s got the size to play a bottom pairing role but seems to be too easy to play against. He does a lot of reaching for pucks instead of creating contact. He doesn’t absorb contact on board play too. It’s clear how he plays isn’t what Berube prefers. He wants his D to be hard to play against.
And at 3 AAV it’s going to be hard to find a trading partner without retention, if the Leafs don’t want to take a contract back. IMO Treliving should have let Lilly walk instead of giving him a contract at 3 AAV
 
Last edited:

AcerComputer

Registered User
Aug 4, 2014
5,349
3,421
Lilly is 200 pounds and 6’1”. He’s got the size to play a bottom pairing role but seems to be too easy to play against. He does a lot of reaching for pucks instead of creating contact. He doesn’t absorb contact on board play too. It’s clear how he plays isn’t what Berube prefers. He wants his D to be hard to play against.
And at 3 AAV it’s going to be hard to find a trading partner without retention, if the Leafs don’t want to take a contract back. IMO Treliving should have let Lilly walk instead of giving him a contract at 3 AAV
I think you proved my point. His game does not fit in a bottom pairing role. It would be like putting Kessel on the 4th line.
 

VeteranPresence

Registered User
Aug 13, 2024
470
791
If I am the Ducks I offer a 3rd or 4th rounder.

My two cents anyways.

The Ducks have too many D as it is, no room for him there.

I'd be okay with him in Edmonton as a #4 option next to Nurse, but the cap just doesn't work without either heavy retention or Toronto taking Kulak (which I'd be leery about because I love his stabilizing influence on the third pair). That would leave our third pair being some combination of Dermott, Emberson, Stecher and/or Josh Brown which I don't think is a formula for success.
 

KrisLetAngry

MrJukeBoy
Dec 20, 2013
19,252
5,438
Saskatchewan
The Ducks have too many D as it is, no room for him there.

I'd be okay with him in Edmonton as a #4 option next to Nurse, but the cap just doesn't work without either heavy retention or Toronto taking Kulak (which I'd be leery about because I love his stabilizing influence on the third pair). That would leave our third pair being some combination of Dermott, Emberson, Stecher and/or Josh Brown which I don't think is a formula for success.
Only 2 shoot right and talks of moving on from Cam Fowler. Could see Fowler going to a team needing a top 4 D and them taking Liligren for the right side.

I can't see Edmonton and Toronto working on a cap trade. Only way is if Kulak was sent to a 3rd team.
 

Community

44 is Rielly good
Oct 30, 2010
6,984
1,984
The Darkest Timeline
This thread was right

He really is the odd man out on game 1
It's game 1 of a b2b. I wouldn't be surprised if he is in for game #2 and takes the spot back.

I think Keefe is a good coach, but he was pretty awful at developing our young, non-elite talent. Super short leash for Robertson and I think the system didn't give much room for error for our defensemen which is especially difficult for young dmen.

Liljegren still has plenty of time to develop and trading him for capspace so that we can fit in Jarnkrok is a massive mistake.

At a minimum, Leafs should wait until the TDL to make a move if we need help on defense.
 
  • Like
Reactions: SmoggyTwinkles

WetcoastOrca

HFBoards Sponsor
Sponsor
Jun 3, 2011
40,022
25,759
Vancouver, BC
It's game 1 of a b2b. I wouldn't be surprised if he is in for game #2 and takes the spot back.

I think Keefe is a good coach, but he was pretty awful at developing our young, non-elite talent. Super short leash for Robertson and I think the system didn't give much room for error for our defensemen which is especially difficult for young dmen.

Liljegren still has plenty of time to develop and trading him for capspace so that we can fit in Jarnkrok is a massive mistake.

At a minimum, Leafs should wait until the TDL to make a move if we need help on defense.
‘Liljegren still has plenty of time to develop’

Not sure about that. At 25 and a half he’s running out of time. Other players will pass him on the depth chart.
The fact he didn’t even crack the starting lineup with a new coach is a red flag and means that it wasn’t really Keefe holding him back but rather the player failing to improve in areas that he needed to.
 

Community

44 is Rielly good
Oct 30, 2010
6,984
1,984
The Darkest Timeline
‘Liljegren still has plenty of time to develop’

Not sure about that. At 25 and a half he’s running out of time. Other players will pass him on the depth chart.
The fact he didn’t even crack the starting lineup with a new coach is a red flag and means that it wasn’t really Keefe holding him back but rather the player failing to improve in areas that he needed to.

I really don't put near as much stock in opening night roster on a b2b. I think that Liljegren and McMann should (and will) get a chance to play in game #2 and if they play better than the players they replaced they will likely continue to make the lineup.

There was a stretch last year when Mo was out when Liljegren played big minutes and played extremely well. He didn't have a good camp, but there's a good player in there that just needs to figure out how to improve his consistency.
 

Figgy44

A toast of purple gato for the memories
Dec 15, 2014
13,947
9,280
Barrie is a much better player at 1/3 the cost.

I bet the Leafs would take him for Lil right now.

Barrie was available to the whole league for free last week.

So yes, Lil is a cap dump with negative value.

Barrie is a straight up stop gap though. Liljegren at least is a project with potential upside. I think both teams might consider such a trade, but Barrie would be the one who isn't too happy to be sent back to Toronto.

It was kylington not valimaki.

No it was Valimaki. Foote, Brannstrom, Valimaki, Liljegren and Vaakanainen were all drafted in sequence from 14-18.

2017 NHL entry draft - Wikipedia

Flames fans were puzzled why we didn't draft Liljegren (needed RD) and took Valimaki instead, but started to see what the scouts saw quickly. Valimaki rocketed up to the best of that group with a bit of extra room very quickly showing second pairing competency far sooner than the other guys. But something went seriously wrong (just pandemic?) for the development of all of those guys though and now they're all languishing with Valimaki taking the biggest tumble soon after his ACL injury. POJ (23rd) drafted a few picks later is in the same boat as those guys that fell. Joker (Buffalo) is the guy who is currently the best out of all of them (drafted at 29).
 

WetcoastOrca

HFBoards Sponsor
Sponsor
Jun 3, 2011
40,022
25,759
Vancouver, BC
I really don't put near as much stock in opening night roster on a b2b. I think that Liljegren and McMann should (and will) get a chance to play in game #2 and if they play better than the players they replaced they will likely continue to make the lineup.

There was a stretch last year when Mo was out when Liljegren played big minutes and played extremely well. He didn't have a good camp, but there's a good player in there that just needs to figure out how to improve his consistency.

‘I really don't put near as much stock in opening night roster on a b2b.’

Opening night roster is actually pretty important whether it’s back to back or not.
Not a vote of confidence by the current coach who already has raised concerns about him.
 

Community

44 is Rielly good
Oct 30, 2010
6,984
1,984
The Darkest Timeline
‘I really don't put near as much stock in opening night roster on a b2b.’

Opening night roster is actually pretty important whether it’s back to back or not.
Not a vote of confidence by the current coach who already has raised concerns about him.
This coach has only had one training camp with the team. If Liljegren still isn't starting when we're 20 games into the year then I'll be concerned.

I am confident that Liljegren is a better dman than Timmins and Benoit... one mediocre/below average preseason isnt enough to change that.
 

Gilmour1996

Registered User
Oct 16, 2022
1,158
1,409
Expand your view of hockey outside of the Toronto Maple leafs. There's 32 teams in the league.
Maybe follow the league and familiarize yourself with more teams than the leafs.
Even my buddy when he gets silly drunk till he sees double doesn't repeat himself like that! And there are still many NHL heads who are even dumber with other people's money than buddy. Lou and Kyle to name two, but no two GMs see the same player alike which explains some of the trades and signings we've seen over the years. Only time will tell whether Lilly gets traded for a mid-round draft pick. It's all a crapshoot anyway.
 
Last edited:

steelcurtain6

Registered User
Sep 20, 2024
8
5
Philippe Myers was never a "high end prospect."

In fact, he was never even drafted into the NHL.
Sorry. He was a UDFA, who scouts thought should have or would have been a 1st rounder. 1st rounder is often considered a high end prospect.
 

TFHockey

The CEO of 7-8-0
May 16, 2014
7,217
4,607
Edmonton
Liljegren Might Interest Edmonton

An interesting idea, but the Oilers don't have a ton of cap room. I can't see how they'd fit a $3M defenseman who isn't able to crack the Leafs line up without something going back salary-wise.

I mean, why trade Cody Ceci only to acquire Liljegren? Their salary cap hits are similar and while Ceci has his warts he is way more established than Liljegren.
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad