dm1371
Registered User
Canucks should take this and run. Gives them a legit 3C and a guy who had success under Tocchet.
Done. Hopefully they run far enough and don't come back!
Canucks should take this and run. Gives them a legit 3C and a guy who had success under Tocchet.
Sorry, you misspelled Slafkovsky (+ your choice of 1 of Xhekaj/ Barron/ Kovacevic).We'll give you Dvorak for him
Yes.So Kuzmenko, who had been in Vancouver for ten minutes, was essential to keep in order to prevent a locker room, fan and corporate sponsor revolt but it was fine to dump their literal captain and 10 year Canuck Bo Horvat in the same week? You're making a lot of sense.
Seems to have worked out great. As we all know, Elias Pettersson signed an 8 year extension to keep playing with his BFF Kuzmenko and Canucks fans are showing up in their #96 jerseys to watch him sit in the press box.Yes.
Not a single chance in hell. He will never repeat what he did last season.Sorry, you misspelled Slafkovsky (+ your choice of 1 of Xhekaj/ Barron/ Kovacevic).
hey if you want to argue and continue using fan boi logic, you are in the right place. i will bow out though, its not my thing.Seems to have worked out great. As we all know, Elias Pettersson signed an 8 year extension to keep playing with his BFF Kuzmenko and Canucks fans are showing up in their #96 jerseys to watch him sit in the press box.
These eye test guys sure are stubborn eh? Gretzky didn’t even sniff 27% when he scored 92 in the high flying 80’s, but Andrei frigging Kuzmenko was going to keep doing it? Oh sorry, they watched him play! Watched him score a bunch of goals on easy tap-ins because he was allowed to stand by the net. As though NHL defenses were just going to keep allowing that to happen forever.Andrei Kuzmenko played up to the standard of someone scoring on almost twice as many shots as Auston Matthews, the league's best finisher, has over his career? If that's true the Hall of Fame should make an exception and induct him while he's still playing.
Nobody is saying Kuzmenko had 20 goals go in off his ass but the fact remains nobody in the NHL sustains anything close to a 27% or even 20% shooting percentage in the long run. He could compensate for this by generating far more shots but he's not a good enough player to do so. This was the most glaringly obvious sell high moment in recent history and the Canucks whiffed.
Well done Sherlock, I bet the team figured that out and that is why he is only paid $5.5m on a short term deal. If they thought he was better than Horvat, they would have paid him Horvat money. That contract BTW is already aging poorly on Long Island. The Canucks knew he would regress and he has. Maybe they trade him, maybe they don’t. But to think he was extended simply because he had a good season, you would have to explain why he isn’t getting paid $11m per. I will wait.These eye test guys sure are stubborn eh? Gretzky didn’t even sniff 27% when he scored 92 in the high flying 80’s, but Andrei frigging Kuzmenko was going to keep doing it? Oh sorry, they watched him play! Watched him score a bunch of goals on easy tap-ins because he was allowed to stand by the net. As though NHL defenses were just going to keep allowing that to happen forever.
It’s kind of funny that on one hand the Canucks extended Kuzmenko based on his fairytale season and on the other hand they traded Horvat to dinosaur Lou who probably though he was getting a perpetual 40 goal scorer based on Horvat’s one hot season where he scored more than 31 goals (his previous high). He’s only on pace for 25 this season so how ‘bout that. He’s who he’s always been and will continue to be. But I’m sure Lou watched him play last year and was convinced.
The numbers always have their way of averaging out whether eye test guys want to admit it or not. I wish I could play against some of these guys in my fantasy league it would be easy to rinse them on sell-high trades.
Habs may give you Monahan for him?With Kuzmenko not playing upto his pace last season (he was unlikely to score 39 again), what's his value right now? It would have been best to offload him last season for the most value but that ship has sailed and with how unhappy Tocchet is with Kuzmenko's play, I'm sure the Canucks would consider moving on from him if it means getting back a top 6 winger or top 4 Dman in a package.
Who would that be?Rangers would probably interested depending on the price, but salary would have to go back the other way.
Probably Barclay Goodrow and his 4 years contract.Who would that be?
It's a risk. Guy looks very lazy. Looks to have had a lucky year and now is in the dumpster. Whoever gets him, they better take him to a nice high end restaurant to welcome him to their team. He might sulk otherwise.
*Laughs in NHL GM and Ownership who purchase trade buy and sell players like they were property*The goal of a team is not to generate incremental asset growth. The goal is to win.
The team feels that this player contributes to that goal and therefore isn’t concerned about selling high.
There is no prize for most asset growth!
Only fan boi’s think of selling players like it’s their financial balance sheet.
You forgot theSorry, you misspelled Slafkovsky (+ your choice of 1 of Xhekaj/ Barron/ Kovacevic).
I think your point projection is overly optimistic. I'd guess more in the range of 45-55 but who knows, there's not really enough of a sample size to go onHe's not lazy.... he just didnt learn " winning" style hockey under Bodreau last year. Tochett is all about system play and being hard to play against. Its an adjustment for Kuzy.
Though he doesnt carry a line, he is still an elite offensive player in my opinion. His hands, creativity and agility are top notch. Id say he is a consistent 60 -70 point winger moving forward and given an offensive role.
Ya so that is a non starter. But I'm open to money back.Probably Barclay Goodrow and his 4 years contract.