sting101
Registered User
- Feb 8, 2012
- 16,779
- 16,094
Sure do you have his agents phone number?Why don't you pull up the info and enlighten us on the other 9 teams on his list?
Sure do you have his agents phone number?Why don't you pull up the info and enlighten us on the other 9 teams on his list?
You said CapFriendly has this info. Go pull it up then.Sure do you have his agents phone number?
Capfriendly lists that he has a NTC, teams are only known by the agent.You said CapFriendly has this info. Go pull it up then.
I didn’t see a link to the by-law, just the cut and paste, And couldn’t find the by-law with google, if you have it, can you post it, thanks.
Okay thanks, that’s why I couldn’t find it. I feel like I found a copy 5-10 years ago, but not since.Unfortunately I'm not aware of a publicly available source for the By-Laws.
Yes we know that. What CapFriendly doesn’t tell you is if the NTC was void for the season. It just tells you if the contract has one.Capfriendly lists that he has a NTC, teams are only known by the agent.
I'll tell you what Vegas had that CapFriendly doesn't have... easy access to the player and his agent.Yes we know that. What CapFriendly doesn’t tell you is if the NTC was void for the season. It just tells you if the contract has one.
CapFriendly didn’t have any information that Vegas didn’t have.
How does this in any way refute my argument?I'll tell you what Vegas had that CapFriendly doesn't have... easy access to the player and his agent.
it lists a 10 team No tradeYou said CapFriendly has this info. Go pull it up then.
The contract says that he has the right to submit a 10 team no trade list. The contract does not specify whether or not his list for the season is void.it lists a 10 team No trade
And my point was only that it's funny that a public website that is commonly used for a reference point on salaries for amateurs and fans apparently had more info than the head office of the Knights could abstract. What a hilarious fuxx up for the Gifted Knights it looks good on them and pointing fingers at Ottawa just makes it pathetic.
It's not like this issue for cap hasn't been lingering around and you would think when they started drumming up things to do that they would have not been so incompetent and waited till there was no time left putting Dadonov's career in a bad place and risking that there could be an issue
The important thing is somehow the league managed to do the right thing here. Was not expecting that. Vegas lol
Not refuting your argument, Bud, I’m adding to it.How does this in any way refute my argument?
OP said “Pretty hilarious that Capfriendly has the info yet the Knights supposedly didn't.”
Does Vegas having access to the player and agent somehow prove that “CapFriendly has the info”? Let me repeat what’s been stated in this thread a million times: CapFriendly did not have the info regarding the validity of the NTC.
This situation was more nuanced than simply asking “how did Vegas not know this when CapFriendly did?”
The contract says that he has the right to submit a 10 team no trade list. The contract does not specify whether or not his list for the season is void.
Whoops, my bad. The ellipses in your comment made me think you were being sarcastic.Not refuting your argument, Bud, I’m adding to it.
Yes. When the list was submitted for this season, he was with Ottawa, so Ottawa had the list. Vegas likely took Ottawa’s word, or purposely played dumb once Vegas traded for him and noticed they didn’t receive the list.So wouldn't it be incumbent upon the team whom he plays for to confirm it & not take another teams' word for it?
Legitimately, VGK had more information than CapFriendly. It is just that the information VGK had was either wrong (believing the M-NTC was invalid when the trade was attempted) or they ignored the M-NTC clause and hoped that the trade would go through regardless (e.g. Dadonov would waive for ANA).it lists a 10 team No trade
And my point was only that it's funny that a public website that is commonly used for a reference point on salaries for amateurs and fans apparently had more info than the head office of the Knights could abstract. What a hilarious fuxx up for the Gifted Knights it looks good on them and pointing fingers at Ottawa just makes it pathetic.
It's not like this issue for cap hasn't been lingering around and you would think when they started drumming up things to do that they would have not been so incompetent and waited till there was no time left putting Dadonov's career in a bad place and risking that there could be an issue
The important thing is somehow the league managed to do the right thing here. Was not expecting that. Vegas lol
Yes. When the list was submitted for this season, he was with Ottawa, so Ottawa had the list. Vegas likely took Ottawa’s word, or purposely played dumb once Vegas traded for him and noticed they didn’t receive the list.
Yes. When the list was submitted for this season, he was with Ottawa, so Ottawa had the list. Vegas likely took Ottawa’s word, or purposely played dumb once Vegas traded for him and noticed they didn’t receive the list.
To add to this, my guess is that once Vegas traded for him and noticed they didn’t receive the list, they thought that instead of confirming with his agent, they would try to pull a fast one on the league, Ducks, and Dadonov and blame Ottawa if they got caught. They sure as hell must have known what they were doing here.
It really doesn't matter i'm not that invested in the argument. Were both not privy to discussions at either end of these deals so were left to speculate.The contract says that he has the right to submit a 10 team no trade list. The contract does not specify whether or not his list for the season is void.
Let me fix this for you.That tweet means nothing to me, honestly. I'm not holding my breath for the NHL to document what exactly happened, but doing business the way Vegas did in this situation will continually bite you in the ass.
It's still a red flag, no? Whether still accurate or not based on a void, a team should have done their due diligence regardless who is at fault.Yes we know that. What CapFriendly doesn’t tell you is if the NTC was void for the season. It just tells you if the contract has one.
CapFriendly didn’t have any information that Vegas didn’t have.
Ottawa might have their own internal issues...hiring Pierre McGuire for example, but I don't fault them for Vegas' f*** up here.Let me fix this for you.
I'm not holding my breath for the NHL to document what exactly happened, but doing business the way the Senators does sucks for the rest of the league
Ottawa might have their own internal issues...hiring Pierre McGuire for example, but I don't fault them for Vegas' f*** up here.
Until definitive proof surfaces that confirms what Ottawa did or didn't tell Vegas, it's all conjecture. Regardless, Vegas had 9 months to verify his NTC status & chose not to.
Plus there's a quote in the LA Times that says Dadonov was asked to waive for Anaheim. So....