It's more the opposite honestlyYes but the Ducks have lots of forwards and not much on D
Actually they need forward depth in their system, their D prospect depth is like Top in the league.Yes but the Ducks have lots of forwards and not much on D
Possibly but not 100%. Philly could have coveted DrysdaleI mean I don’t see why making it public would have made a difference. I’m sure the Ducks assumed that was the case considering he was on the table.
Not sure if you're joking but we have TOO MANY prospects on D. Mintyukov, Luneau, Zellweger, etc.Yes but the Ducks have lots of forwards and not much on D
How much time do you have ?Wait what does he have against Philly?
Then they should have gotten more for a top 5-10 prospect in the entire world.Cutter didn’t want to sign with Philly. Good trade. Moved him before the word was out that he wasn’t going to sign and that would
Have lowered his value
Damn surprised the ducks gave on Drysdale so quick
I saw him as Morgan Rielly 2.0
50-70 Pt player whi has great offense, skating and transition skills but suspect defense.
A low end 1D in his prime
Have to bank that Zellweger is their Point producing PP QB Dman. Figured only one of Drysdale/Zellweger would be with the Ducks long term.Damn surprised the ducks gave on Drysdale so quick
I saw him as Morgan Rielly 2.0
50-70 Pt player whi has great offense, skating and transition skills but suspect defense.
A low end 1D in his prime
Why did the Ducks give up on a top 5 picked dman so early?
Wait what does he have against Philly?