Why are you going on a tangent when I'm inquiring about Drysdale being a defensive hole? It's as if you didn't read my dissertation on the trade that you quoted from. Crazy.
We're not using data from two seasons ago. We're talking about Drysdale this season. There isn't a "what if" he's turning a corner, he did turn a corner b/c he was looking like our best defenseman out there at age 21 in the NHL. In my dissertation, I didn't say we should keep Drysdale, but I gave other factors why Drysdale was made expendable. You should go read it again.
The 2nd round pick could be due to injury or could be to "offer the Flyers they cannot refuse" in order to beat out the other 10-18 teams inquiring about Cutter. We just don't know, which is why I called out your scenario as a "what if".
I don't think that Dry was a defensive hole, but his play in his own zone was inconsistent and sometime just bad. His gap control was not great and he often seemed lost/out of position.
For sure that's to be expected from a young d-man and he has the tools to develop into a solid 1-2 D - he'll have to model his game after Niedermeyer, though Scott seemed bigger/more solid.
If you look back at my posts, I was a huge Drysdale pumper after his first year. I still think he'll be great. But at this stage, in the D-zone, Minty > Dry, so there's that.
You have to give to get. I don't know much about Gauthier, but if he's proves to be as good as some people predict (TBD), then this is a good trade for the ducks. Verbeek and the Ducks have done a good job scouting elite guys - McTavish, Minty, Carlsson. So I'll give them the benefit of the doubt for now.