Confirmed with Link: [ANA/OTT] Erik Gudbranson for 2021 5th round pick

McDonald19

Registered User
Sep 9, 2003
23,161
4,231
California
I liked Gudbranson’s game and thought he might even be signed for a few years.

5th round picks are meh...but I understand the cap situation.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Ducks DVM

bsu

"I have no idea what I am doing" -Pat VerBleak
Sep 27, 2017
28,539
29,293
Highly doubt we get any good defensemen in FA.
 
  • Like
Reactions: KelVarnsen

gilfaizon

Registered User
Mar 28, 2012
2,418
1,630
PEI
It’s more if you factor in the Kesler LTIR. I’m not sure how that works in the off-season to be honest.

The rule used to be something like, you can go 10% over the cap in the offseason. Then we would place Kesler on the LTIR at the beginning of next season? IIRC
 
  • Like
Reactions: McDonald19

The Duck Knight

Henry, you're our only hope!
Sponsor
Feb 6, 2012
8,410
5,112
702
It’s more if you factor in the Kesler LTIR. I’m not sure how that works in the off-season to be honest.

You only get max LTIR benefits when you're right at the cap. If we put him on LTIR right now it would only give us an extra 2m in space. In order to maximize the LTIR space they would need to spend the cap they have left first before they put Kesler on.
 
  • Like
Reactions: McDonald19

MMC

Global Moderator
May 11, 2014
51,185
43,205
Orange County, CA
Ej1dI3BVcAATnb2
 

All Mighty

Registered User
Sep 20, 2014
12,338
19,787
California
allmightyhockeytalk.com
I’m going to predict that Barrie will be our target. His value will be pretty low after last season, and I can’t see a quality team offering him much, especially with a flat cap. A perfect scenario to me would be a 1 or 2 year deal so he can rebuild his value.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Sam Steel

MCB

Registered User
Jun 21, 2019
955
1,095
Y'all aren't thinking like murray. Bringing Bieksa out of retirement. 7 years full NMC.
Kidding aside vat would be a dream but I am holding my hopes so I'm not disappointed too much.
 
  • Like
Reactions: McDonald19

robbieboy3686

Registered User
Jan 17, 2016
3,272
2,206
I’m going to predict that Barrie will be our target. His value will be pretty low after last season, and I can’t see a quality team offering him much, especially with a flat cap. A perfect scenario to me would be a 1 or 2 year deal so he can rebuild his value.
It will probably be 3 years. We have to over pay to get players to come to Anaheim. It just is what it is!
 

Zegs2sendhelp

HFBoards Sponsor
Sponsor
Jul 25, 2012
42,548
39,385
We have to be looking for a dman. There’s a giant hole behind Manson now, this clears cap space and a roster spot.

Also good asset management. Pay nothing for Gudbransson and get a pick out of it. Thanks Dorion.

I dont really like Barrie much... if thats who we are targeting... he should ideally help our powerplay and our transition game ... but damn is he a mess in his own end.

And what do we go
Fowler Barrie?

That pairing would get demolished with any type of zone pressure.
 

robbieboy3686

Registered User
Jan 17, 2016
3,272
2,206
Shattenkirk isn’t the target imo. He played super well in a contract year, just won the cup. Unless he’s this super humble character guy, I don’t see him playing with the same fire he did this past season. I see him coasting the rest of his career. Barrie on the other hand, younger dude, there’s a ton of value in the fact that he had a bad season. Bargain bob likes bargains. And Barrie this season , perfect time to sign him.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Paul4587

Paul4587

Registered User
Jan 26, 2006
31,198
13,215
Also if we are targeting a RHD to help the PP I really hope it’s Barrie and not Shattenkirk. Both are bad defensively but the former is younger, better and can QB a first unit. Shattenkirk while still useful is more a second unit guy which we already have an abundance of in Curran (if he makes it), Fowler and Lindholm.
 

Duck Off

HF needs an App
Oct 25, 2002
21,012
5,473
Oklahoma
Also if we are targeting a RHD to help the PP I really hope it’s Barrie and not Shattenkirk. Both are bad defensively but the former is younger, better and can QB a first unit. Shattenkirk while still useful is more a second unit guy which we already have an abundance of in Curran (if he makes it), Fowler and Lindholm.

this. Bob does not need to be signing Shattenkirk long term. I fear that’s his target though.
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad