- Why do teams keep bailing the rangers out of bad contracts?
- It's so amazing, and keeps happening from multiple GMs, that you have to wonder if the league office get insolved.
- Why would the Ducks do this? A million ways to get to the cap floor next year without giving up any assets for a player that doesn't help your rebuild at all.
To be honest Trouba is still a good vet and the cap has jumped such a ridiculous amount in the past few years that low spending teams could eat any contract in the league and still have space.
Also contrary to hf beliefs most top tier free agents pick their spot way before free agency and GMs know how likely their market is to get one. Gms have to sell to fans they were in the mix but most situations are John Tavares. Anaheim knows they're not getting one and have a ton of expiring contracts from mid vets.
They'll flip Trouba at the deadline next year for a haul. He's the premium second pairing version of the scrub bottom pairing physical presences like David savard or Ben chiarot that return a first round pick every year.
Like Anaheim aren't even at the cap floor next season after adding this much. They could still sign Marner and rantanen and be fine but they're getting neither.
None of their prospects are doing well enough to get mega raises. McTavish is probably the most important of the bunch but probably will either bridge or long term around 7 because he hasn't stepped forward enough. Carlsson is next summer and Troubas a free agent then.
It's basically zero risk for a guy they're going to flip for a first at minimum and will help build a good culture. As much as both his moves have been messy breakups, everywhere Trouba has been has had sustained success with him as a key piece. It's obvious team mates like him even though maybe he causes drama for GMs or coaches by standing up for players.
I would have taken him on the Habs too still we need a good stopgap RD who isn't bottom pairing. Probably should have kept kovacevic but who knew injury would happen to Reinbacher.