StephenPeat
Registered User
- Jul 19, 2015
- 4,654
- 1,617
It makes no sense whatsoever to place the same weight on the roughly 10 lines on which he’s spent less than 5-7% of his TOI as you place on the three lines on which he’s spent over 15% of his time each, that shouldn’t really need to be said. Focusing on the three highest percentage line combinations which reflect a majority of his ice time is the simplest, most straightforward, most representative way to look at his line mates and filter negligible samples. Again it’s not rocket science.What? You literally said he spent 2/3 of his ice time with either Matthews/Kapanen or Tavares/Marner. The link shows you he has spent about 18 % of his ES ice time with Matthews/Kapanen and 15 % with Tavares/Marner. Now you're suddenly looking at only the three most common combinations to come to that 57 % number which makes no sense whatsoever.
P.S. Filtering his line combinations as you’re suggesting makes your argument look considerably worse as it means roughly 57% of his ES PTs were scored during the combined 33% of his TOI where he was on the ice with an All-Star Center.