GeorgeKaplan
Registered User
Oooooo, that makes the way your first reply was worded make much more sense. I only have the NHL network hereThey're calling the game for TSN.
Oooooo, that makes the way your first reply was worded make much more sense. I only have the NHL network hereThey're calling the game for TSN.
ZzZzZzZzZzThat’s typical caufield. Meaningless Powerplay goal in a 6-0 game
I mean it happens to the best. the ice seems to be really bad as we’ve seen several blown tires this game.
Stylistically, Boldy reminds be so much of Vesey.
Berard good effort there drawing penalty. I know differential counts but give the bottom 6 some pp time.
Yeah it's a short tournament. It's valuable practice time.It’s very annoying that they’re still rolling just the top 6 on the PP in a blowout. I suspect it’s to build chemistry.
It’s very annoying that they’re still rolling just the top 6 on the PP in a blowout. I suspect it’s to build chemistry.
Yeah definitely for some extra "practice" time especially for pp units. Also Now it could get interesting with Russia losing to the Czech and now the US beating the Czechs. Goal differential could come in to play at some point.It’s very annoying that they’re still rolling just the top 6 on the PP in a blowout. I suspect it’s to build chemistry.
They need the practiceIt’s very annoying that they’re still rolling just the top 6 on the PP in a blowout. I suspect it’s to build chemistry.
When does Vierling start playing this year (if at all)?
Eh maybe he's a victim of the hype. I think the problem is how much people got up to proclaim him the potential best player in the draft and talked about how he could be the best player in the draft easily when he developed and a lot of that talk didn't hedge the bets too much on that either. Basically, he's been talked up a LOT, with some people saying he should have gone first overall because of his "higher upside".
So when he's playing a support role at best in the WJC after his draft year and isn't even doing the things that made him successful in the OHL, the backlash is inevitable.
I think the truth would seem to be that he has fantastic talents and a high upside but he's nowhere close to that upside right now. And if I'm being honest I'd say I would have been nervous if it was the Rangers in the position to pick him because the whole "huge guy with skills that just needs to develop into it and he'll be dominant!" story so rarely works out in such a way that the player actually hits their top upside. What are the odds he really completely hits his full upside and becomes a franchise center? What are the odds he becomes a pretty good NHL center with size, maybe 60-70 points per season? If I'm hedging my bets I'm hedging a bit more towards that 70 point center with size, and that is very valuable but not the 100 point dominant force people keep expecting him to be
And yeah, Byfield also has to learn how to play a pro style game and do more than generate points off the rush
Reminder: The Berard Bonanza continues in 22 minutes.
That’s typical caufield. Meaningless Powerplay goal in a 6-0 game
You mean Kaliev![]()
surprised he didnt make it
no Caufield got the 6th one no?
but you could say the same for kaliyev too. Both guys do nothing f
Yeah, I’m just more down on Kaliev. For a Russian (even by the way of Staten Island) it’s unacceptable. And otherwise outside of this world class shot - what else is there?
Well like I said you could say the same for Caufield and frankly Brisson doesn’t do much more than that either. Not a fan of any of those three