As a retired bartender I'd be very interested.
But then I'd also probably just piss people off with a rant about the idiocy of using single malt whisky in cocktails, which so many distilleries are promoting these days. Why anyone would use $100+ bottle of whisky to make a cocktail is beyond me. The rant follows, skip if you will, since I felt like getting it out of the way over lunch hour.
I say it is pointless because back in the wild west days when I was bartending we used to try out all sorts of things, usually while we were working. Rusty Nails were really popular at the time and so we experimented with them using different brands/qualities/ages of Scotch and using rye or Irish whiskey instead. In the Nail you could generally suss out the difference but it really didn't make much of a difference after all, so long as you weren't using well Scotch. Ballantine's blended whisky was barely discernable from a 12 year old single malt. You could tell an Irish Nail from a traditional Nail, so too with rye. Not surprisingly the recipe above would be different as well, given the bourbon.
We tried it too with whiskey sours. While you could sort of taste the difference between say using rye versus a peaty Scotch, it was really only readily obvious to those of us that drank a lot (an awful lot). Other, more complex cocktails would be even less effective or different. Just pointless to use a 12 year old Macallan in a whisky sour. But hey, spend your money how you see fit.