All Purpose Trade/Roster Building Thread XIII - the 23 deadline approaches

Status
Not open for further replies.

Nikishin Go Boom

Russian Bulldozer Consultent
Jul 31, 2017
23,708
55,334
I'm skeptical, shall we say, of publicly-available analytics, ESPECIALLY with an absolutely godawful Chicago team. I'm pretty sure that the Canes know what they're doing here.
Let’s not pretend that the management team doesn’t ignore yikes factors and take risky moves hoping they pay off. Taking risks doesn’t necessarily spell they know what they are doing. Just means they hope the odds land in their favor. Sometimes it does and other times it hasn’t
 
  • Like
Reactions: MinJaBen

GIN ANTONIC

Registered User
Aug 19, 2007
19,229
15,569
Toronto, ON
Yikes


Kane_EH_Player_Card.png


Its just me I guess
No one is arguing that Kane has good metrics this year. He hasn’t played well on a team that is god awful bad. It’s not hard to understand why he might not have been motivated for most of the year. The last few games he has looked fine… regular ish Patty Kane.

Had the primary assist on the game tying goal tonight with a minute left in regulation leading to a CBH win.

Maybe he’s turning it on at the right time for whichever team he decides to go to.
 
  • Like
Reactions: cptjeff

The Faulker 27

Registered User
Nov 15, 2011
13,143
48,438
Sauna-Aho
If it's truly a player not on anyone's radar it's probably not Kane. He's one of the biggest names swirling around this TDL. Besides he's a big market type player (see how butthurt he was over the Tarasenko trade). I can see him going to a team like Boston long before coming here.

If (hypothetically speaking) Carolina is a last resort type situation for him, I'd rather pass tbh. As @AD Skinner mentioned earlier, maintaining the chemistry of the team is important and Butthurt Kane doesn't sound like a healthy addition.

On a positive note If that's who their guy is, then I fully trust they've done their homework and will welcome the addition. He's a 50 ft player who can score goals and that is what they need.
 
Last edited:

SvechneJerk

Christ is King
Jul 15, 2018
1,603
6,265
NC
If it's truly a player not on anyone's radar it's probably not Kane. He's one of the biggest names swirling around this TDL. Besides he's a big market type player (see how butthurt he was over the Tarasenko trade). I can see him going to a team like Boston long before coming here.

If (hypothetically speaking) Carolina is a last resort type situation for him, I'd rather pass tbh. As @AD Skinner mentioned earlier, maintaining the chemistry of the team is important and Butthurt Kane doesn't sound like a healthy addition.

On a positive note If that's who their guy is, then I fully trust they've done their homework and will welcome the addition. He's a 50 ft player who can score goals and that is what they need.

Conversely, he does feel like someone that holds a grudge & would be highly motivated to do what it takes to rip all the teams that might have passed on him, a new one.

Just an observation.
 

GIN ANTONIC

Registered User
Aug 19, 2007
19,229
15,569
Toronto, ON
If it's truly a player not on anyone's radar it's probably not Kane. He's one of the biggest names swirling around this TDL. Besides he's a big market type player (see how butthurt he was over the Tarasenko trade). I can see him going to a team like Boston long before coming here.

If (hypothetically speaking) Carolina is a last resort type situation for him, I'd rather pass tbh. As @AD Skinner mentioned earlier, maintaining the chemistry of the team is important and Butthurt Kane doesn't sound like a healthy addition.

On a positive note If that's who their guy is, then I fully trust they've done their homework and will welcome the addition. He's a 50 ft player who can score goals and that is what they need.
This has always been my feeling. He seems like a big market, O6 fanboy to me. BUT maybe as the game of musical chairs starts to wind down he reevaluates that. It also takes two to tango.

The urge to leave Chicago has to be stronger than his desire to only play for (insert team) for the move to happen.
 

SvechneJerk

Christ is King
Jul 15, 2018
1,603
6,265
NC
Ok but we're second in the league. Are we desperate for a player that everyone else past on?

My post wasn’t advocating for bringing him on. I can see both sides of it - his potential upside and the potential downside. Like I said, it was just an observation of him personally.

But who knows - I’m just some rando on the interwebs. :dunno:
 

GIN ANTONIC

Registered User
Aug 19, 2007
19,229
15,569
Toronto, ON
I don't want kane coming in here and f***ing up our chemistry. He kind of seems like an arrogant douche from his interviews. Maybe I am wrong.
Yeah… but he’s got that swagger and walks the walk playoff time. Our room might need that a bit. Generally speaking we have mostly nice guys that haven’t exactly lit it up in the playoffs when things have gotten tough
 

The Faulker 27

Registered User
Nov 15, 2011
13,143
48,438
Sauna-Aho
My post wasn’t advocating for bringing him on. I can see both sides of it - his potential upside and the potential downside. Like I said, it was just an observation of him personally.

But who knows - I’m just some rando on the interwebs. :dunno:

I mean it's a valid point there's certainly 2 sides to it. As a rental if Kane is the desperate party in this scenario than that puts us in a better position to negotiate. If he's motivated than even better. It would also get the Canes more publicity if nothing else. I'm sure Tom Dundon wouldn't hate that.
 
Last edited:

Svechhammer

THIS is hockey?
Jun 8, 2017
25,528
93,089
I'd be skeptical of Kane, but wouldn't hate it. He's got elite level offensive ability and would immediately make our forward lines more potent. You add him and our scoring punch on both of the top 2 lines it the caliber that should be dangerous against anyone in the playoffs.

But... my biggest worry is that he's apathetic defensively, and a step slow right now. Not sure he'd be able to consistently keep up with our speed over the stretch run and the playoffs.
 

Chrispy

Salakuljettaja's Blues
Feb 25, 2009
8,767
28,557
Cary, NC
I'd be skeptical of Kane, but wouldn't hate it. He's got elite level offensive ability and would immediately make our forward lines more potent. You add him and our scoring punch on both of the top 2 lines it the caliber that should be dangerous against anyone in the playoffs.

But... my biggest worry is that he's apathetic defensively, and a step slow right now. Not sure he'd be able to consistently keep up with our speed over the stretch run and the playoffs.
If he's having trouble with speed, put him with Kotkaniemi and Teravainen. Kane has played his off-wing some as is, and that lets them set up Kane with less speed or defensive requirements on an offense-centered line.

Something like:
Svech-Aho-Necas
TT-Kotkaniemi-Kane (or flip these, either wing can go here)
Martinook-Staal-Fast
Noesen-Stastny-Jarvis
 
  • Like
Reactions: cptjeff

MadeUpName

Registered User
Mar 24, 2022
1,223
3,160
I'd be skeptical of Kane, but wouldn't hate it. He's got elite level offensive ability and would immediately make our forward lines more potent. You add him and our scoring punch on both of the top 2 lines it the caliber that should be dangerous against anyone in the playoffs.

But... my biggest worry is that he's apathetic defensively, and a step slow right now. Not sure he'd be able to consistently keep up with our speed over the stretch run and the playoffs.
Kane seems like the biggest Dundon-driven add. He wants flash and offense. He wants a player that can win a game. Kane is that addition this deadline. But the choice is more with Kane himself than any interested party.
 

spockBokk

Registered User
Sep 8, 2013
7,490
18,978
Wouldn’t mind Kane, as long as the price isn’t ridiculous. Don’t think he’d be willing to come to NC tho.

I bet they end up with JVR and/or Barbashev and someone like Kulikov
 

Svechhammer

THIS is hockey?
Jun 8, 2017
25,528
93,089
If he's having trouble with speed, put him with Kotkaniemi and Teravainen. Kane has played his off-wing some as is, and that lets them set up Kane with less speed or defensive requirements on an offense-centered line.

Something like:
Svech-Aho-Necas
TT-Kotkaniemi-Kane (or flip these, either wing can go here)
Martinook-Staal-Fast
Noesen-Stastny-Jarvis

You know, these lines could be surprisingly potent, and probably similar to what we would roll in the playoffs, or at least what we should roll.

SAN would be offensively dominant, and would control play every time it was on the ice, as long as they stay hot.
TKK would be an interesting one to watch. It should work, but Turbo needs to step it up a bit to make it happen. Kotkaniemi would be a grinder with upper level passing that would mesh well with Kane.
MSF would be the elite checking line
NSJ would be a low key potent 4th line with Noesen and Jarvis. That one could put up a sneaky amount of points.
 

GIN ANTONIC

Registered User
Aug 19, 2007
19,229
15,569
Toronto, ON
If he's having trouble with speed, put him with Kotkaniemi and Teravainen. Kane has played his off-wing some as is, and that lets them set up Kane with less speed or defensive requirements on an offense-centered line.

Something like:
Svech-Aho-Necas
TT-Kotkaniemi-Kane (or flip these, either wing can go here)
Martinook-Staal-Fast
Noesen-Stastny-Jarvis

I think I'm more into this combo...

TT - Aho - Kane
Svech - JK - Necas
Martinook - Staal - Fast
Noesen - Stastny - Jarvis

The idea of TT - JK - Kane scares me. I don't think you have complimentary skillsets on that line. I feel like they would get caved and just not have good chemistry at all.
 

spockBokk

Registered User
Sep 8, 2013
7,490
18,978
I think I'm more into this combo...

TT - Aho - Kane
Svech - JK - Necas
Martinook - Staal - Fast
Noesen - Stastny - Jarvis

The idea of TT - JK - Kane scares me. I don't think you have complimentary skillsets on that line. I feel like they would get caved and just not have good chemistry at all.

Wont happen, but imagine they pay up for Kane and Barbashev:

Svechnikov-Aho-Kane
Teravainen-Kotkaniemi-Necas
Barbashev-Staal-Fast
Martinook-Stastny-Jarvis
Stepan, Noesen

Kane takes Noesen’s spot on the PP

W/ Kane at 50% and Barbashev at just over $2M, that leaves $2-3M still for another depth D acquisition

Wont happen unless they do an about face on their stance on paying for rentals
 

MadeUpName

Registered User
Mar 24, 2022
1,223
3,160
Wont happen, but imagine they pay up for Kane and Barbashev:

Svechnikov-Aho-Kane
Teravainen-Kotkaniemi-Necas
Barbashev-Staal-Fast
Martinook-Stastny-Jarvis
Stepan, Noesen

Kane takes Noesen’s spot on the PP

W/ Kane at 50% and Barbashev at just over $2M, that leaves $2-3M still for another depth D acquisition

Wont happen unless they do an about face on their stance on paying for rentals
I agree with stacking the top line. It feels like Kane needs Svechnikov on his line. I'm not sure TT-KK-PK can get it done vs Boston or TB.
 
  • Like
Reactions: WreckingCrew
Status
Not open for further replies.

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad