All Purpose Trade/Roster Building Thread XIII - the 23 deadline approaches

Status
Not open for further replies.

Nikishin Go Boom

Russian Bulldozer Consultent
Jul 31, 2017
23,708
55,334
I get this train of thought, but I don’t see how this thought squares with their pursuit of Tkachuk. Do you think they were ignorant of the contract that was need there, or do you think that they were prepared to trade Necas for one year of his QO and then roll the dice?

I think there are two tiers of contracts they are willing sign: young super star players at UFA, and everyone else. That first tier is higher and something we haven’t seen them do yet. Hard to say what they will and won’t do.
100 point power forwards are worth a ton on the market. I would willing to bet a bunch our final offer wasnt 100 point forward worthy. Calgary was backed into a corner and forced to take the best offer. They couldn’t wait for a typical value deal and their market size was limited. Then florida came in.

Eichel was distressed asset. Buffalo wanted 1C compensation, we weren’t willing to go there.
 

Boom Boom Apathy

I am the Professor. Deal with it!
Sep 6, 2006
49,272
101,796
I get this train of thought, but I don’t see how this thought squares with their pursuit of Tkachuk. Do you think they were ignorant of the contract that was need there, or do you think that they were prepared to trade Necas for one year of his QO and then roll the dice?

I thought about that before posting. To me, pursuing him and getting to the point where you have to commit to the contract are two different things. We've seen news come out of this front office before with Aho and older guys like Hamilton, where they've outright stated 'we were close' or 'we gave a competitive offer' only to hear news otherwise.

My point is what is leaked to the news can be misleading until a deal actually happens.

I think there are two tiers of contracts they are willing sign: young super star players at UFA, and everyone else. That first tier is higher and something we haven’t seen them do yet. Hard to say what they will and won’t do.
I'll believe it when I see it.
 

MadeUpName

Registered User
Mar 24, 2022
1,223
3,160
A. if Skjei was anything more than a 1D or 2D by minutes NYR wouldnt have traded him. so call it moving the goal posts but I stand by he wasnt even their 2D. Teams hunting for the playoffs dont make those moves if he truly was a top 4 LHD in their eyes.

B. no receipts for madeupname in that thread.

C. Canesfansbudman trying to say our LHD wasnt deep. We had Forsling waiting right there and we wouldnt let him.

we got super lucky with the trade though. We were a quarter of an inch from missing a pick in that draft and eventually Jarvis.
It is GoldiFox. One of the first posts praising the move. Or SvechniCanesCup. Or LSPWolfpack. Or JussiJuice. Depending on how far back to go.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: DaveG

Big Daddy Cane

HFBoards Sponsor
Sponsor
Feb 8, 2010
14,054
34,202
Western PA
I find the expected parameters for an acquisition not to be practical. The player has to be in their mid-20s, have multiple years of term/control at a friendly hit and be available for the assets the Canes have to offer (not a 1-for-1 hockey trade). They could be waiting for that player to become available indefinitely, while they struggle to reach the 2 GF/G mark in the playoffs (as has been the case in the 4 series eliminations). That’s going to wear on them at a certain point.
 

Boom Boom Apathy

I am the Professor. Deal with it!
Sep 6, 2006
49,272
101,796
I find the expected parameters for an acquisition not to be practical. The player has to be in their mid-20s, have multiple years of term/control at a friendly hit and be available for the assets the Canes have to offer (not a 1-for-1 hockey trade). They could be waiting for that player to become available indefinitely, while they struggle to reach the 2 GF/G mark in the playoffs (as has been the case in the 4 series eliminations). That’s going to wear on them at a certain point.
I think most fans agree, but until they show differently in their actions, it's hard to accept that they'll change, even if, as you've stated, it's not practical. I'm not complaining though. This front office has brought about the most sustained success we've seen so they are doing a lot of things right.
 

Ole Gil

Registered User
May 9, 2009
5,751
9,126
I hate to be a negative Nancy Negan :sarcasm:, but I was thinking the same thing. For Meier to sign any extension, it's likely going to start with a 9, or he'll just take his qualifying offer and become a UFA the next year. The ability to sign an 8 year deal isn't much leverage in his situation, because he can take 1 year at $10M and sign a 7 year deal at $9M+ in UFA and still come out ahead.

I know many say the Canes front office would treat him differently as he's not 28+ and/or it's an inflection point for the Canes where they'll make a move like that, but until I see them do it, I'm skeptical. Thus I think we will have a tough time in a Meier deal. Hope I'm wrong, but that's how I see it.

72 million in the bank vs. 10m and hoping to stay health, keep performing well, and then cash in for an extra 10 million.

It's an interesting decision.
 
  • Like
Reactions: WreckingCrew

MinJaBen

Canes Sharks Boy
Sponsor
Dec 14, 2015
21,345
82,843
Durm
  • Like
Reactions: DaveG

Nikishin Go Boom

Russian Bulldozer Consultent
Jul 31, 2017
23,708
55,334
We’re likely back to a Boeser deal if this Weekes rumor is true. Our deal will likely be better than Minnesota’s because we don’t have to move 3 million in long term cap to make it work.

Crouse is a possibility but im not sure we pony up for him.

I still throw out identical lower end offers for Bertuzzi and Barbashev. See which of Detroit and St Louis say yes first before the bell.
 

Boom Boom Apathy

I am the Professor. Deal with it!
Sep 6, 2006
49,272
101,796
72 million in the bank vs. 10m and hoping to stay health, keep performing well, and then cash in for an extra 10 million.

It's an interesting decision.
it is. It's an easier risk to make when you already have earned $38M in your career though (counting the $10M QO). My point was more that he's not likely to sign for a discount, even with an 8 year deal. I've read a few times that he said he'd sign, but want's north of $9M / year.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Ole Gil

Joe McGrath

Registered User
Oct 29, 2009
18,496
39,805
I actually would love to have Kevin Hayes...when you consider that Fletcher is rather reactionary (to put it nicely) and may give up a first to dump the contract to drunkenly chase Pastrnak/Meier/Larkin. I would love to have Philly's 1st.
They aren’t trading a Bedard lottery ticket, however unlikely to dump Hayes. You couldn’t get a video game to do that.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Ad

Ad

Ad