There is lots of explanations as to why his ice time is what it is so we aren't unfairly criticizing our own team.
There are probably a half dozen of them? Keeping him healthy, driving the second scoring line, shift length, inefficiency when he plays more mins, difficult to play with, bad turnovers. The injury stuff is hard to criticize, except it didn't seem to affect his performance much?
They all have plausibility and are perfectly logical reasons for doubt. And none have stood up to a whole lot of scrutiny on their own. Not from what I've seen anyway.
All this stuff is used to explain why it's understandable to have done what some real fundamental stats indicate is a bad idea. But none have really disproved the whole Scheifele-Connor-Ehlers suboptimal use, just provided reasoning behind the decision-making.
The team will be better with Scheifele and Ehlers on the top line, and Connor on the second scoring line. Give it half a season and it will play out the same way it has for years now in smaller stints. It sounds like Arniel may have clued into this already, and is planning to leverage this.
It's nice to know that our team had a great year and still has some room for improvement internally just from shuffling lines.
driving the 2nd line is great and all, but imo not expense at the top line being around even or negative. there's also been 2nd line combos w/o ehlers that have been fine ie: iafallo-names-perfetti, or connor-pld-svech/perfetti.
id also say it's not unusual for the 2nd line to be the third-line in TOI as well. if the 2nd line is getting more or equal minutes than the 1st line then ok sure there's a better argument, & i think you'll get achieve better balance.
where is this whole inefficiency when he plays more minutes coming from exactly? if we consider ehlers-scheifele-x line duo as a reference point for him being top line (thus more minutes compared to his usual spot) the stats the last 3 seasons from what i gathered (from natural stat trick)
ehlers pts/60 does take a hit w/o scheifele for sure, but he's actually a more efficient scorer playing more minutes & w/ scheifele than not (duhh). a 2.49 pts/60 for reference would have been 24th in the NHL this year for Fwds, & still tops for the Jets. so still extremely good. I would expect there's a drop off playing w/ names, stastny, pld, copp etc. whoever else at 2c, but it's still hovering at elite NHL levels.
if anything, we should be talking how scheifele's efficiency takes a bigger overall hit among a combo of points,GF/60 and Goal-Differential. not the other way around. why is there such an avoidance on this forum in regards to that? seems like the "top line" talks or threads get hijacked to "oh no ehlers shouldn't be top line" or w/e. Scheifele's drop off in efficiency should be the more highlighted topic for real. (i even bolded and made it yellow).
as for the shifts/toi stuff.... at 5v5 in Dec-2023 ehlers and the Jets were at their best. using natural stat tricks "zone starts" and TOI at 5v5 it's like 2 more shifts (or
starts) per game, equating to about 2 mins extra. i have 0 clue if 2 more extrashifts per game is sustainable over 82 gp.