On flip side both Hayes and Ludwinski have had terrible starts to pro careers
Good news is they are both only 20 years old but the jump from OHL to AHL has proven difficult for them
It was that he produced. Most of us don't have the luxury of watching these guys and all we have is checking numbers on Hockeydb.com. If a guy is scoring, that means he's got a ton of potential despite any flaws in his game that don't show up in the box score.I've never got the love for Gavin Hayes, don't see NHL quality there at all.
My problem with the whole Boisvert thing is trading up 2 spots when they probably didn't have to. He's a good prospect and I like him over Moore, actually.Musto moves the overton window around here more than people care to admit and more than he should.
My problem with the whole Boisvert thing is trading up 2 spots when they probably didn't have to. He's a good prospect and I like him over Moore, actually.
Yeah I won't complain.Key word being probably, if he lands at his ceiling it was 100% the right move.
My guess is they were hoping Jett or NBM made it to 18. but it did not go that way. 17-21 were probably the next tier of prospect. Boisvert eiserman, hage, connelly parascak. I heard they were high on Jett from somebody.My problem with the whole Boisvert thing is trading up 2 spots when they probably didn't have to. He's a good prospect and I like him over Moore, actually.
In my viewings of Rockford, I actually have been pretty impressed with Hayes. His skating seems to have improved, and I was surprised to see a bit of jam to his game. He is playing down in the lineup, and hasn't produced a ton so far, but I would not write him off yet.I've never got the love for Gavin Hayes, don't see NHL quality there at all.
It would have to improve even more if he wants a regular role in the NHL. I could see him as a grinder at most in the NHL on a crap team, but not much more than that.In my viewings of Rockford, I actually have been pretty impressed with Hayes. His skating seems to have improved, and I was surprised to see a bit of jam to his game. He is playing down in the lineup, and hasn't produced a ton so far, but I would not write him off yet.
Who gives a f*** if he ends up hitting his potential?My problem with the whole Boisvert thing is trading up 2 spots when they probably didn't have to. He's a good prospect and I like him over Moore, actually.
I've never got the love for Gavin Hayes, don't see NHL quality there at all.
Is it true that Boisvert is only on PP2?Watching UND tonight. And Minny. Boisvert just scored.
He sometimes goes to PP1 but he’s also been on PP2. He’s still prone to turnovers and gets a peeper whackIs it true that Boisvert is only on PP2?
Thompson has great wheels and he's all heart. I loved Slaggert when it wasn't coolHonest question here not trying to be a smart ass. How does points production for a 180 lb 22 year old in college lead to a 4th liner? Don't you want your 4th liners to be bigger, grindier guys who kill penalties?
I have no idea what his motor is or if he has good defensive instincts but isn't it more likely that he, or any high scoring light 22 year old in college, either becomes a top 9 guy in the NHL or top 6 guy in AHL/Europe than a 4th liner in the NHL?
Vanacker - misconductLardis - 3 assists
Pharand - goal and assist
Spellacy - 1 assist
Greene - 2 assists