HYORI 1963
Grit & Character
I would have liked both Gagner and Grabner. Think about all that speed and scoring threat. Grabner's going to cost a Pearson+ or a 1st+ easily.
I would have liked both Gagner and Grabner. Think about all that speed and scoring threat. Grabner's going to cost a Pearson+ or a 1st+ easily.
The Mayor John Hoven @mayorNHL 2h
Haven't confirmed yet, but likley once #Oilers asked for prospect over a draft pk for Gagner, (see last night's tweet), things went sideways
Thats the end of that?
If that's the asking price for Grabner, I'd pass.
The last time Grabner netted 30+ goals was 2010-11, and it's only happened once in his career.
If you prorate last year to a full season, he'd have 30 goals.
And prorated Brown was a 30+ goal scorer and Carter a 45+ goal scorer...If you prorate last year to a full season, he'd have 30 goals.
That's assuming he keeps up at the pace he was scoring at, which is questionable. He has 9 this season. I don't view him as a player who would excel here and I'd rather give up the assets you're talking about for a better player. Not a Grabner.
That's assuming he keeps up at the pace he was scoring at, which is questionable. He has 9 this season. I don't view him as a player who would excel here and I'd rather give up the assets you're talking about for a better player. Not a Grabner.
And prorated Brown was a 30+ goal scorer and Carter a 45+ goal scorer...
Not a fan of proratings...
If you prorate last year to a full season, he'd have 30 goals.
You don't base a player on one season, that would be very shortsighted and inaccurate assessment, you balance it out.
But you are banking on his one 30+ goal season to think that he could be a legit top six forward on the Kings. If they're moving a guy like Clifford for Grabner, that's fine, but Pearson and/or a 1st rounder? No thanks. Those assets should be talked about for bringing in a legit top line player, not a borderline top six forward who struggles to find the net at times, which the Kings are already full of.
Anyone know if teams are allowed to still discuss trades during the roster freeze?
I'm not basing it on one season. Like I said, I'm taking all seasons into consideration, and not just this season, like you are.
Clifford for a Grabner is an ABSOLUTE JOKE! You referred to Clifford as trash and now you think we should be able to land a guy like Grabner???
Since you're big on projections, he's projected to score 13 goals and 29 points this season. Sure, let's give up first round picks and young prospects who were taken in the first round for players who produce numbers like that.
Since you're big on projections, he's projected to score 13 goals and 29 points this season. Sure, let's give up first round picks and young prospects who were taken in the first round for players who produce numbers like that.
Like I said, your view's shortsighted. My perspective is more broad and gives a better and truer assessment. Who in their right mind would base a player on just a single season?
Pearson was the last pick in the first as an overager and went completely undrafted before. Do you think Pearson will ever have a goal per game clip Grabner has in his career?
Do you read what you are writing? You are calling Grabner a 30+ goal scorer based on one friggin' season of success that he had. Look at his entire body of work. He didn't follow up that season with spectacular numbers now did he? He got off to a terrible start this season as well.
It's like calling Jason Blake a 40+ goal scorer than calling me short sighted. You're too much.
Do you read what you are writing? You are calling Grabner a 30+ goal scorer based on one friggin' season of success that he had. Look at his entire body of work. He didn't follow up that season with spectacular numbers now did he? He got off to a terrible start this season as well.
It's like calling Jason Blake a 40+ goal scorer than calling me short sighted. You're too much.